S32DS_Vision_v2.0 Are the performance of apexcv::LKPyramidOpticalFlow(run on apex) AND apexcv::LKTrackerOpticalFlow(run on apex) better than cv::calcOpticalFlowPyrLK(run on cpu) on the S32V234 evb board?

取消
显示结果 
显示  仅  | 搜索替代 
您的意思是: 

S32DS_Vision_v2.0 Are the performance of apexcv::LKPyramidOpticalFlow(run on apex) AND apexcv::LKTrackerOpticalFlow(run on apex) better than cv::calcOpticalFlowPyrLK(run on cpu) on the S32V234 evb board?

521 次查看
deliadong
Contributor I

S32DS_Vision_v2.0  
Are the performance of apexcv::LKPyramidOpticalFlow(run on apex)  AND apexcv::LKTrackerOpticalFlow(run on apex)
better than cv::calcOpticalFlowPyrLK(run on cortex A53) on the S32V234 evb board?

I want to know the performance of API in D:\NXP\S32DS_Vision_v2.0\S32DS\s32v234_sdk\libs\apexcv_pro(run on apex),

Compared with the corresponding interface of opencv(run on cortex A53).

such as apexcv::LKPyramidOpticalFlow, apexcv::LKTrackerOpticalFlow.

Can anyone give me a definite conclusion?

标签 (2)
0 项奖励
0 回复数