Build breakage using current meta-fsl-ppc

[abdurrehman]

Hi,

We are seeing same build breakage as mentioned here:
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale/2015-January/012367.html

Following is the commit probably responsible for this:

commit d7df92b6f5c1a673341d54d6b064ad2fd7b16d74

Author: Ting Liu <ting.liu at freescale.com>

Date: Wed Jan 7 17:54:59 2015 +0800

  udev-extraconf: replace bbappend with own recipe

  * introduce variable RULE for DPAA FMan ethernet ports name rule.

  * use 72-fsl-dpaa-persistent-networking.rules for t1024, same as e6500.

  Signed-off-by: Ting Liu <ting.liu at freescale.com>

An excerpt from build log:

Collected errors:

* check_data_file_clashes: Package udev-rules-qoriq wants to install file /var/arehman/mel-cedar/build_p2020rdb/tmp/work/p2020rdb-mel-linux-gnuspe/console-image/1.0-r0/rootfs/etc/udev/mount.blacklist

    But that file is already provided by package  * udev-extraconf

* opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package packagegroup-base-extended.

ERROR: Function failed: do_rootfs

Note that we are on the latest meta-fsl-ppc layer: commit 060e2779783a8e581cdace77bf833e4b80f63279

Any updates on the fix?

Regards,

Abdur Rehman

[Pavel]

What command sequence is used for SDK building?

Is Ubuntu operation system is used for SDK?

Have a great day,
Pavel

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[abdurrehman · Accepted solution]

The fix for this issue has been merged in upstream. meta-fsl-ppc - Layer containing Freescale PPC hardware support metadata

Thanks for the support