MQX 3.8 Building Libraries for Tower K60N512

[chandrasekarkan]

typedef struct pcflash_drive_info_struct

{

   uint_32  NUMBER_OF_HEADS;

   uint_32  NUMBER_OF_TRACKS;

   uint_32  SECTORS_PER_TRACK;

} PCFLASH_DRIVE_INFO_STRUCT, _PTR_ PCFLASH_DRIVE_INFO_STRUCT_PTR;

When I try to build BSP library, I am getting "expression syntax error" on the line "typedef struct pcflash_drive_info_struct".... What am I doing wrong?

[c0170]

Hello,

can you paste here your terminal output inside your IDE (full error definition) ? I don't see any syntax error there from the code you pasted here, should be compiled.

Regards,

0xc0170

[chandrasekarkan]

Hi..! I downloaded a latest version of MQX (4.0.1) then I built the libraries and its built fine.

I am working on a custom board, which has MK60DN512ZVLQ10 (144pin) uC on it. I want to run MQX kernel on it.
Please help me with it...

I have BSP cloning wizard: which BSP can I clone for MK60DN512ZVLQ10 twrk60d100m or twrk60n512?

Regards !

[santiago_gonzal]

Hello,

You should use TWR-K60N512 to port the BSP.

Regards,

Santiago

[chandrasekarkan]

many thanks Fabian.... I am a beginner on Kinetis uCs, What is the basic difference between K60D100M and K60N512??... any help???!!!!

[danielchen]

From the description we know that, for future designs, we recommend to use the TWR-K60D100M instead of TWR-K60N512

But, your customer's board is  MK60DN512ZVLQ10 (144pin), it belongs to Kinetis Rev1.x BSP,  and TWR-K60N512 is belongs to Kinetis Rev1.x BSP too,  so you can start porting from TWR-K60512.

For TWR-K60D100M, it belongs to Kinetis Rev2.x BSP.

There is a document list the difference between two

http://cache.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/app_note/AN4445.pdf?fsrch=1&sr=1

you can see there are lots of difference

In the long run, I recommend you start from TWR-K60D100M,  because TWR-K60N512(Rev1.x) is initial version, some bugs may be fixed in Rev2.x. You can get more support on Rev2.x

[danielchen]

Hi

K60D100M and K60N512 are two different development boards

Your can check the following link for K60D100M description

TWR-K60D100M Product Summary Page

You can check the following link for K60N512 description

TWR-K60N512 Product Summary Page

[santiago_gonzal · Accepted solution]

Hello,

The difference is silicon version. K60D100M is the new version of K60N512 board. Both use the same uC (Kinetis K60), but if you have a look at the chip, you will notice a difference in the partnumber, the one in K60N512 has a Z (From Zero, that means it uses the first version of the silicon) and the K60D100M hasn't the Z.

You have all the differences between the silicons here:

http://www.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/app_note/AN4445.pdf

Regards,

Santiago