If its possible to replace a TDA8950TH for a TDA8954TH without modification?
Pin to Pin replacement?
Hi Jorge,
I have checked the data sheets of the TDA8950 and the TDA8954. I did notice one difference between the two IC’s. In the TDA8950 application the resistor which determines the oscillator frequency (ROSC) is connected to VSSA. In the TDA8954 application this resistor is connected to pin 11 (OSCREF). However, the OSCREF pin is internally connected to VSSA through a 2 ohm resistor, so I do not expect any issues when the TDA8954 is used in a TDA8590 application.
Best regards,
Tomas
Thank you Tomas!
Best Regards!
Contacto:
Jorge FranzoniAlberti 663Bahia Blanca 8000
Linea: 0291 4887082Movil: 291 5049858
El viernes, 8 de febrero de 2019 05:46:55 ART, TomasVaverka <admin@community.nxp.com> escribió:
|
NXP Community |
|
Re: TDA8950TH vs TDA8954TH
reply from Tomas Vaverka in Other NXP Solutions - View the full discussion
Hi Jorge,
I have checked the data sheets of the TDA8950 and the TDA8954. I did notice one difference between the two IC’s. In the TDA8950 application the resistor which determines the oscillator frequency (ROSC) is connected to VSSA. In the TDA8954 application this resistor is connected to pin 11 (OSCREF). However, the OSCREF pin is internally connected to VSSA through a 2 ohm resistor, so I do not expect any issues when the TDA8954 is used in a TDA8590 application.
Best regards,
Tomas
Reply to this message by replying to this email, or go to the message on NXP Community |
Start a new discussion in Other NXP Solutions by email or at NXP Community |
Following Re: TDA8950TH vs TDA8954TH in these streams: Inbox |
This email was sent by NXP Community because you are a registered user.
You may unsubscribe instantly from NXP Community, or adjust email frequency in your email preferences