Hi,@Harvey021
I found that using seTool and using ssscli to obtain the same keyid (NIST_P256) differ in the obtained ref.pem. Why is this
Why does seTool only implement acquisition (NIST_256), not implementation (NIST_P384, etc.), and cannot find relevant examples in the demo, making it difficult for users to implement them themselves
Thanks
When I looked up the source code of seTool, I found that the source code only implemented the function of NIST-P256, but did not support NIST-P384 or NIST-P521. Do you have a reference demo
Thanks