Pins for MK10DN512ZVLK10 are wrong?

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Pins for MK10DN512ZVLK10 are wrong?

Jump to solution
1,197 Views
ScottW
Contributor II
I've created a project with the MK10DN512ZVLK10 CPU (The 80-pin K10), and the pinouts that I see in the "Target CPU" view don't match what is in the reference manual. I'm comparing against this document as the datasheet for the part: Document Number: K10P81M100SF2 Rev. 5, 5/2011 K10 Sub-Family Data Sheet Supports the following: MK10DN512ZVLK10, MK10DN512ZVMB10 Pins 1-61 match, and after that they are off by one. Pin 62 in the reference manual is labeled as PTC5 in Figure 29 (K10 80 LQFTP Pintout Diagram), but the view in the IDE shows pin 62 as PTC6. Pins 62-79 are all shifted down by one, and the missing PTC5 shows up as pin 80. I'm using CodeWarrior Eclipse v10.1 on Windows, and the files generated by the Processor Expert say this: This file was created by Processor Expert 5.1 [04.49] I'm using those pins as SPI communication, and since the SPI is working and the layout was done according to the datasheet, I am assuming it's Processor Expert that is incorrect about the pin assignments.
Labels (1)
Tags (1)
0 Kudos
1 Solution
974 Views
ProcessorExpert
Senior Contributor III

Hello,

 

thanks for reporting this, you are correct the pinout in Processor Expert V5.1 is incorrect. The RM K10P81M100SF2RM
Rev. 5, 8 May 2011 is correct and should be used. As workaround please use the pinout from this RM for your project.

 

The fix will be published within CW V10.2

 

We are sorry for the inconvenience.

 

best regards
Vojtech Filip
Processor Expert Support Team

 

 

View solution in original post

0 Kudos
1 Reply
975 Views
ProcessorExpert
Senior Contributor III

Hello,

 

thanks for reporting this, you are correct the pinout in Processor Expert V5.1 is incorrect. The RM K10P81M100SF2RM
Rev. 5, 8 May 2011 is correct and should be used. As workaround please use the pinout from this RM for your project.

 

The fix will be published within CW V10.2

 

We are sorry for the inconvenience.

 

best regards
Vojtech Filip
Processor Expert Support Team

 

 

0 Kudos