FAQs
English (US) 日本語 | Japanese 中文 | Chinese (Simplified)

CAN 2.0 vs SAE J1939

cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

CAN 2.0 vs SAE J1939

‎10-31-2016 07:51 PM
2,607 Views
monstor
Contributor II

I am using S12 to implement the CAN communication protocol. We would mainly use CAN 2.0.

In the datasheet, It mentions that S12 can support CAN 2.0. May I know can S12 support SAE J1939? As I know CAN 2.0 and SAE J1939 has the similar extended header frame. Are they compatible?

Thank you.

Reply
1 Reply

‎11-02-2016 05:59 PM
1,708 Views
egoodii
Senior Contributor III

The short answer is 'yes', these CAN 2.0 peripherals are EXACTLY what you need for J1939.  The way J1939 uses the full-size CAN 2.0 ID just means you have to run the receiver in 'promiscuous mode' and do all traffic filtering in firmware.

The longer answer is 'go to Simma Software' for a full high-performance J1939 stack, already guaranteed to run on that uP.

Reply