Hi Jennie,
Thanks for looking into this.
Your last sentence explains a part of the problem. Is there a different flash programming tool that does work with Windows 10?
Now back to using CW11.
Is there any way to prove where my problem lies, either TAP/target or the tools configuration? My environment is CW11 on Windows 10 with USB TAP now updated to v1.10 and CCS version 4.13.
USB TAP is detected with correct S/N:
(bin) 6 % show version
Received CMD_SERVER_VERSION
command done - Ok
CCS Windows Release Build 438p0
CodeWarrior Connection Server version {4.13}
(C) Copyright 2003-2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
(bin) 7 % findcc utaps
USB TAP Serial Numbers:
08160018
08160018
(bin) 8 %
Here's the CCS log from CW starting debug session:
ccs_open
ipaddr = 127.0.0.1
port = 41475
timeout = 60
serverh = 0
ccs_open; ccs_error = 0
ccs_get_connection_count
serverh = 0
count = 1
ccs_get_connection_count; ccs_error = 0
ccs_available_connections
serverh = 0
count = 1
ccs_available_connections; ccs_error = 0
ccs_available_connections
serverh = 0
count = 1
ccs_available_connections; ccs_error = 0
ccs_cc_version
serverh = 0
cc = 0
version.major = 1
version.minor = 3
ccs_cc_version; ccs_error = 0
ccs_set_timeout
serverh = 0
timeout = 60
ccs_set_timeout; ccs_error = 0
ccs_write_reg
coreh = [serverh:0;cc_index:0;chain_pos:0]
index = 39
count = 1
value: (size = 1)
0x00000020
ccs_write_reg; ccs_error = 7; duration=0 ms
Error message: Invalid handle
ccs_read_reg
coreh = [serverh:0;cc_index:0;chain_pos:0]
index = 37
count = 1
value: (size = 1)
0x00000000
ccs_read_reg; ccs_error = 7; duration=0 ms
Error message: Invalid handle
I also have CCS window log with "show command" on. I just do not know how to interpret it.
I'm specifically puzzled with the following from the log:
Received CMD_RESET_TO_DEBUG
Sending CMD_SERVER_ALIVE
Sending CMD_SERVER_ALIVE
Sending CMD_SERVER_ALIVE
Sending CMD_SERVER_ALIVE
Sending CMD_SERVER_ALIVE
USB TAP command done - Subcore error encountered during multicore operation
I do not think 56F8345 has multiple cores. This makes me think of configuration.
Maybe having such a log from a working setup would help but I do not have one like that.
I have two versions of the board in question and they both behave the same.
Best,
Chester