NXP CAN Replace the problem

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

NXP CAN Replace the problem

Jump to solution
295 Views
TeemoLi
Contributor III

Please see the below pictures for TJA1042T and TJA1042CT.

The old part number TJA1042T is not recommend for new design.

The TJA1042CT can P2P Replace the TJA1042T. But the Data rata[max ]kbps is different.

TJA1042T :  5000 Kbps         

TJA1042CT :  5 kbps.

please comfirm the  data rate is  TJA1042CT :  5 kbps or  5000kbps?

Why TJA1042CT  is cheaper than TJA1042T . 

TJA1042CT.pngTJA1042T.png

0 Kudos
1 Solution
284 Views
TomasVaverka
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

Hi Yufeng,

Both the TJA1042BT and TJA1042CT are based on our latest SOI3+ process. Below you can see the improvements and benefits of this process. They also have a shorter propagation delay supporting larger network topologies.

The TJA1042T and TJA1042CT have the SPLIT pin (#5) for stabilizing the recessive bus level.
The TJA1042T(K)/3 and TJA1042BT(K) have the VIO pin (#5) for interfacing with 3.3V MCUs.

All these information can be found in the datasheet.

 

The max. data rate of 5 kbps is a typo, the correct one is of course 5 Mbit/s.

 

Capture.JPG

BR, Tomas

 

View solution in original post

0 Kudos
1 Reply
285 Views
TomasVaverka
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

Hi Yufeng,

Both the TJA1042BT and TJA1042CT are based on our latest SOI3+ process. Below you can see the improvements and benefits of this process. They also have a shorter propagation delay supporting larger network topologies.

The TJA1042T and TJA1042CT have the SPLIT pin (#5) for stabilizing the recessive bus level.
The TJA1042T(K)/3 and TJA1042BT(K) have the VIO pin (#5) for interfacing with 3.3V MCUs.

All these information can be found in the datasheet.

 

The max. data rate of 5 kbps is a typo, the correct one is of course 5 Mbit/s.

 

Capture.JPG

BR, Tomas

 

0 Kudos