LX2160XN72232B VS LX2160CA72232B

キャンセル
次の結果を表示 
表示  限定  | 次の代わりに検索 
もしかして: 

LX2160XN72232B VS LX2160CA72232B

290件の閲覧回数
Ted_Chiang
Contributor I

I see that the development board for the LX2160CA72232B is BLBX3-T2, not LX2160A RDB.

Can I use the LX2160CA72232B to replace the LX2160XN72232B in the original solution without changing the firmware and software? Are there any other differences between these two chips besides AEC-Q100?

0 件の賞賛
返信
3 返答(返信)

246件の閲覧回数
Oswalag
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

Hello,

 

You can refer to the datasheet, Table 130. Part numbering nomenclature.

for example:

Automotive part numbering nomenclature

LX2160CA72232B -> A = SEC disabled, CAN-FD enabled.

 

Industrial part numbering nomenclature

LX2160XN72232B -> N = SEC disabled, CAN 2.0b enabled (no CAN-FD support) 

0 件の賞賛
返信

230件の閲覧回数
Ted_Chiang
Contributor I

Thanks. Can I directly follow LSDKUG to develop LX2160CA72232B? It also has LX2160A V2.0 Die inside?

0 件の賞賛
返信

203件の閲覧回数
Oswalag
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

Yes, letter B at the end means: B = Rev 2.0

0 件の賞賛
返信