Hi,
I have used the Bytecraft compiler for years and have less experience with the Ashware product. I would profer an alternate view on the previous answer, as I have always found Bytecraft exceptionally responsive to any defects reported. The compiler has had it's features over the years, no argument, but in my experience is the much preferred option. They have close ties to Lauterbach and provide a comprehensive solution with rapid fixes if you manage to break it, next day normally.
The Ashware simulator is getting long in the tooth, and offers limited test capabilities but is still the tool of choice for early stage development. It's cycle accurate simulation is reliable in my experience, but the integration into the stimulation layer is constraining. So when you come to do anything adventurous and combine core efforts, you will find it a challenge to simulate.
I would agree with the previous user that an IDE is pretty surplus to requirement. I use the Freescale environment and some build scripts.
I'm am independent eTPU specialist, and whilst I would not say the Ashware compiler is a lesser product, I personally use the Bytecraft compiler by choice with Lauterbach. The Ashware simulator is an essential tool for any significant development work. My feeling is that as companies they each have specialisms.
Rob
