Using PF8121, MC32PF8121EUEP, to supply voltage to i.mx8 mini quad

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Using PF8121, MC32PF8121EUEP, to supply voltage to i.mx8 mini quad

837 Views
faiz
Contributor I

Hello,

I am planning on using PF8121 for our application, specifically, MC32PF8121EUEP. This is the power tree I have based on the i.mx8m mini quad evk:
BD71847MWVMC32PF8121EUEP
SequencePWR/SignalREGVoltageSequenceREGVoltage
1NVCC_SNVS_1V8LDO11.80vsnvs1.8
2VDD_SNVS_0V8LDO20.81sw10.8
5VDD_SOC_0V8BUCK10.82sw50.8
6VDD_DRAM&PU_0V9BUCK50.92sw20.9
6VDD_PHY_0V9LDO40.92ldo31.8
7VDD_ARM_0V9BUCK20.93sw30.9
7VDDA_1V8LDO31.83ldo41.8
8VDD_1V8/NVCC_1V8BUCK71.85sw41.8
9NVCC_DRAM_1V1BUCK81.16sw61.1
10VDD_3V3/NVCC_3V3BUCK63.37sw73.3
10NVCC_SD2MUXSW3.3/1.87ldo23.3/1.8
11VDD_PHY_1V2LDO61.24ldo13.3
It doesn't seem that voltage map 1:1 so I had a couple of questions:
1) For VDD_SNVS_0V8, I am using a switch (SW1) instead of LDO (LDO2). Do you think this could cause an issue?
2) For VDD_PHY_0V9, I would need an external LDO from 1.8V to 0.9V, correct?
3) For NVCC_SD2, do you see any issue with using ldo2 instead of muxsw?
4) For VDD_PHY_1V2, I would need an external LDO from 3.3V to 1.2V, correct?
5) As you can see in column 5, the power on sequence is different than EVK. Would that cause any issues?
Thank you,
Faiz Ahmed
Tags (1)
0 Kudos
1 Reply

691 Views
guoweisun
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

Hi

The power on sequence should be same with the EVK,after refer to below picture,you can according the output voltage and sequence to optimize the connection between PF8121 and I.MX8MM.

pastedImage_1.png

_ARM

0 Kudos