I am trying motor control with MTRCKTSBNZVM128.
I want someone to answer my question.
I am using the samples MTRCKTSBNZVM128_HALL_CW11 and MTRCKTSBNZVM128_SENSORLESS_CW10.
As shown in the graph below, HALL (1) has larger current consumption than SENSORLESS.
The horizontal axis is the number of revolutions [rpm], and the vertical axis is the current [A].
However, when you try at a certain time, it is equivalent to SENSORLESS like HALL (2).
I confirmed the source code, but I think both are 120 degree conduction, not vector control.
I have not changed the NXP kit at all.
Is there a possibility that the HALL sample behaves like SENSORLESS under some conditions?
I'd like to receive advice.