snvs supply on imx6ul

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

snvs supply on imx6ul

1,302 Views
sadatanvashisth
Contributor II

What is the minimum supply I can give to SNVS_IN through a LDO whose input is lithium ion battery which may go down to 3V during discharging. My VDD_HIGH_IN is 3V.

Tags (1)
0 Kudos
12 Replies

1,091 Views
Yuri
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Hello,

 

  According to i.MX 6UL Datasheet(s), VDD_SNVS_IN  should be in range  2.40 - 3.6 V

Note, the voltage difference between VDD_SNVS_IN and  VDD_HIGH_IN should not exceed

0.3 V. The i.MX 6UL is designed to allow current flow between these power domains proportional

to the voltage difference.

Have a great day,

Yuri

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer

button. Thank you!

0 Kudos

1,091 Views
sadatanvashisth
Contributor II

Thanks for the prompt reply Yuri.

We are currently using PMIC MC32PF3000A3EP (In default configuration)  for power management and connected 2.7V generated by LDO from Lithium ion battery to LICELL (Pin no.36). Will it meet the required voltage levels.

Regards,

Sadatan

0 Kudos

1,091 Views
Yuri
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Hello,

   Your configuration may be used. 

Regards,

Yuri.

0 Kudos

1,091 Views
sadatanvashisth
Contributor II

Thanks for the Reply Yuri.

So this configuration will not going to result in damage of processor due to flow of any current between any two supplies like VDD_SNVS_IN and  VDD_HIGH_IN, right?

0 Kudos

1,091 Views
Yuri
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

 I think - yes. But, strictly speaking, it is needed to review the scheme :-) 

0 Kudos

1,091 Views
sadatanvashisth
Contributor II

PMIC connection With processor.pngPMIC Section.png

Here we are using LICELL =2.7V which is being generated by LDO LDK130 , input of this LDO is 3.7V Li-ion battery which may go down to 2.8 to 3V.

0 Kudos

1,091 Views
Yuri
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

OK!

0 Kudos

1,091 Views
sadatanvashisth
Contributor II

So can you please review and let me know your inputs?

Regards,

Sadatan

0 Kudos

1,091 Views
Yuri
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

 I do not have additional comments regarding the scheme. 

~Yuri.

0 Kudos

1,091 Views
sadatanvashisth
Contributor II

Hi Yuri,

Thanks a lot for your support , my only purpose of sharing the scheme was to get your final comment as you suggested that you can confirm whether it will work or not after reviewing the scheme . So are you saying after reviewing the shared scheme that it is ok?

0 Kudos

1,091 Views
Yuri
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Scheme looks quite reasonable. 

1,091 Views
sadatanvashisth
Contributor II

Hi Yuri,

Thanks a lot for all the support.

Regards,

Sadatan

0 Kudos