FAQs
English (US) 日本語 | Japanese 中文 | Chinese (Simplified)

S32DS_Vision_v2.0 Are the performance of apexcv::LKPyramidOpticalFlow(run on apex) AND apexcv::LKTrackerOpticalFlow(run on apex) better than cv::calcOpticalFlowPyrLK(run on cpu) on the S32V234 evb board?

cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

S32DS_Vision_v2.0 Are the performance of apexcv::LKPyramidOpticalFlow(run on apex) AND apexcv::LKTrackerOpticalFlow(run on apex) better than cv::calcOpticalFlowPyrLK(run on cpu) on the S32V234 evb board?

‎06-21-2018 01:33 AM
501 Views
deliadong
Contributor I

S32DS_Vision_v2.0  
Are the performance of apexcv::LKPyramidOpticalFlow(run on apex)  AND apexcv::LKTrackerOpticalFlow(run on apex)
better than cv::calcOpticalFlowPyrLK(run on cortex A53) on the S32V234 evb board?

I want to know the performance of API in D:\NXP\S32DS_Vision_v2.0\S32DS\s32v234_sdk\libs\apexcv_pro(run on apex),

Compared with the corresponding interface of opencv(run on cortex A53).

such as apexcv::LKPyramidOpticalFlow, apexcv::LKTrackerOpticalFlow.

Can anyone give me a definite conclusion？

Labels (2)
Labels
0 Kudos
Reply
0 Replies