Hello,
I am using CW6.2 with a HC908EY16.
It took me VERY long to figure out that my interrupt pointers either work on the Full-Chip-Simulator or on the real silicon. The Problem seems to be that the Full-Chip-Simulator does not allocate space for the SWI interrupt vector.
Thus, I have to use two different interrupt vector tables in my prm file:
// For Full-Chip Simulator
VECTOR 0 _Startup // Reset vector: this is the default entry point for an application.
// VECTOR - // SWI vector <--- This Vector has to be kept as comment!!!
// VECTOR 1 // IRQ vector
// VECTOR 2 // CMIREQ
VECTOR 3 KWTrigger // TIMA0
// VECTOR 4 // TIMA1
VECTOR 5 KWUeberlauf // TIMA overflow
// VECTOR 6 // TIMB0 compare
// VECTOR 7 // TIMB1
VECTOR 8 IgniteNow // TIMB overflow
// VECTOR 9 // ESCI error
VECTOR 10 RXInterrupt // ESCI receive
VECTOR 11 TXInterrupt // ESCI transmit
// VECTOR 12 // KBD
// VECTOR 13 // ADC complete
// VECTOR 14 // SPI receive
// VECTOR 15 // SPI transmit
// VECTOR 16 // Time base
// Für HC08
VECTOR 0 _Startup // Reset vector: this is the default entry point for an application.
// VECTOR 1 // SWI vector
// VECTOR 2 // IRQ vector
// VECTOR 3 // CMIREQ
VECTOR 4 KWTrigger // TIMA0
// VECTOR 5 // TIMA1
VECTOR 6 KWUeberlauf // TIMA overflow
// VECTOR 7 // TIMB0 compare
// VECTOR 8 // TIMB1
VECTOR 9 IgniteNow // TIMB overflow
// VECTOR 10 // ESCI error
VECTOR 11 RXInterrupt // ESCI receive
VECTOR 12 TXInterrupt // ESCI transmit
// VECTOR 13 // KBD
// VECTOR 14 // ADC complete
// VECTOR 15 // SPI receive
// VECTOR 16 // SPI transmit
// VECTOR 17 // Time base
For the FCS, I have to comment out the lower block and for the HC08, I have to comment out the upper block.
I suppose this is a bug, isn't it?
