NXP unveils its new LPC800 family

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

NXP unveils its new LPC800 family

546 Views
lpcware
NXP Employee
NXP Employee
Content originally posted in LPCWare by fjrg76 on Tue Nov 13 10:28:23 MST 2012
Great new line of Cortex-M0+ microcontrollers, I can't wait to get mine!!

http://www.nxp.com/news/press-releases/2012/11/nxp-revolutionizes-simplicity-with-lpc800.html

Does anyone knows why NXP doesn't offer 16 and 20 DIP packages in any of its microcontrollers families? There is LPC1114 in 28 DIP package, but it would be nice to have 16 and 20 DIP packages.
0 Kudos
12 Replies

533 Views
lpcware
NXP Employee
NXP Employee
Content originally posted in LPCWare by Dilberto on Sun Dec 23 16:11:03 MST 2012
With 2 USARTs, it's perfect to make a protocol converter.
For instance, I use a weighing scale which sends unconditionally bursts of strings with weight information and I must interface it with a modbus RTU network.
What I need more than the chip ?:D
0 Kudos

533 Views
lpcware
NXP Employee
NXP Employee
Content originally posted in LPCWare by vasanth on Fri Nov 16 22:31:23 MST 2012

Quote: frame

analogue periphery seems not to be one of NXP's strength, at least compared to other Cortex M0/M3 vendors...



Cool product. Innovative peripherals..:). But wait. where is my ADC...:eek:
Atleast a four channel 10-bit ADC is needed to kill those 8-bitters. Thanks...;)
0 Kudos

533 Views
lpcware
NXP Employee
NXP Employee
Content originally posted in LPCWare by frame on Thu Nov 15 07:32:59 MST 2012
Apart from PIC-bashing, I believe analogue blocks consume some more silicon, often require some
factory-trimming on the die, and pull in other blocks (like Vdd decoupling, band-gap voltage references, etc.).

And, to be honest, analogue periphery seems not to be one of NXP's strength, at least compared
to other Cortex M0/M3 vendors...

And what I miss most on Cortex M0 devices is a DIV/IDIV instruction.
0 Kudos

533 Views
lpcware
NXP Employee
NXP Employee
Content originally posted in LPCWare by serge on Thu Nov 15 00:29:57 MST 2012

Quote:
No, there's at least 3 of us.



Make it 4 ... :p
0 Kudos

533 Views
lpcware
NXP Employee
NXP Employee
Content originally posted in LPCWare by graynomad on Wed Nov 14 23:37:54 MST 2012

Quote:
I used to think I was the only one who hates PICs, but now I see I'm not alone


No, there's at least 3 of us.

This does look like a very nice chip, now I have to think of an application for one.
0 Kudos

533 Views
lpcware
NXP Employee
NXP Employee
Content originally posted in LPCWare by CodeRedSupport on Wed Nov 14 05:14:14 MST 2012
And in case anyone missed our earlier announcement with regards to LPC800 and LPCXpresso...

Beta support for LPC800 Cortex-M0+ parts

Regards,
CodeRedSupport
0 Kudos

533 Views
lpcware
NXP Employee
NXP Employee
Content originally posted in LPCWare by ub3r on Tue Nov 13 22:24:44 MST 2012
Awesome. 32bit cpu in a 8pin package.
Just need some eeprom and ADC and then itll kill everything. ;)
0 Kudos

533 Views
lpcware
NXP Employee
NXP Employee
Content originally posted in LPCWare by js-nxp on Tue Nov 13 20:07:47 MST 2012
As I posted elsewhere:


Quote:
When will people learn? 8 bits will never die.

:D
0 Kudos

533 Views
lpcware
NXP Employee
NXP Employee
Content originally posted in LPCWare by fjrg76 on Tue Nov 13 18:59:01 MST 2012

Quote: gbm

Some weak points:
- only 4 timer outputs



There is only one timer, and historically each timer in any NXP uC only has only four outputs


Quote:

- lack of ADC



I do agree, but there must be a reason why there isn't an ADC in this new family


Quote:

- no low-power UART (but some form of wakeup is probably implemented)



[I]15.3.2 Configure the USART for wake-up
The USART can wake up the system from sleep mode in asynchronous or synchronous mode on any enabled USART interrupt. [/I]



Quote:

- no 6-pin SOT23-6 version :) - I want one!



You just said you want more than four timer outputs, didn't you? You'll run out of pins!! :D

This uC will rock!!
0 Kudos

533 Views
lpcware
NXP Employee
NXP Employee
Content originally posted in LPCWare by fjrg76 on Tue Nov 13 18:39:45 MST 2012
I used to think I was the only one who hates PICs, but now I see I'm not alone :D
0 Kudos

533 Views
lpcware
NXP Employee
NXP Employee
Content originally posted in LPCWare by frame on Tue Nov 13 12:21:52 MST 2012

Quote:
8-pin one is clearly an ATtiny killer.

And I hope it kills the ineffable PIC1X devices, too.
0 Kudos

533 Views
lpcware
NXP Employee
NXP Employee
Content originally posted in LPCWare by gbm on Tue Nov 13 11:52:26 MST 2012
Strong points:
- 2 UARTs in 8-pin case and < 16 KiB chips, 3 UARTs in bigger models
- switch matrix - assign any pin to any peripheral function
- Flash with 64-byte erasable pages, may be easily used for data
- timer with advanced state machine
- capability to implement any logic function on 8 pins in hardware - may be used also for synthesizing strange logic gates
- wakeup timer for easy waking up from power-saving modes
- new UART without all bad features of historic 16C550

Some weak points:
- only 4 timer outputs
- lack of ADC
- no low-power UART (but some form of wakeup is probably implemented)
- no 8-pin SO-8 or SOT23-8 version
- no 6-pin SOT23-6 version :) - I want one!

Anyway, LPC800 looks like an attractive descendant of LPC111x, esp. considering the 3 UARTs

Well done, NXP. Can't waith to get my hands on the new LPCxpresso board and the chips.

8-pin one is clearly an ATtiny killer.
0 Kudos