NXP support - Unanswered post

[lpcware]

Content originally posted in LPCWare by larryvc on Wed Dec 10 11:02:07 MST 2014
@NXP support, I started the LPCOpen v2.13 example project periph_sct will not work as written - Fixed code included thread the other day.  I also added some follow up posts in that thread because they are about the same topic.  Can you please take a look at the thread and give me some feedback.  You may delete this post after that.

[lpcware]

Content originally posted in LPCWare by larryvc on Thu Dec 11 13:08:17 MST 2014
Thank you NXP_Support

[lpcware]

Content originally posted in LPCWare by NXP_Support on Thu Dec 11 09:13:00 MST 2014
Hi Larry,

Sorry for the delay in responding to your posts, and thank you again for your  feedback.  I responded to the original thread: your feedback has been logged for the SW teams and should be picked up in the next release cycle. 

Best regards,
-NXP Support

[lpcware]

Content originally posted in LPCWare by rocketdawg on Wed Dec 10 17:05:50 MST 2014
I know!
I hate many of the magic numbers that I see in NXP code.
If I have to dig though some data sheet to understand what
somereg |= (3 << 4) | (1 << 12); 
does,
then I would ask that the developer read "clean code".
because there is little excuse.