AnsweredAssumed Answered

KSDK memory footprint on KL15Z128

Question asked by Noam Ziv on Dec 6, 2015
Latest reply on Jan 5, 2016 by Iva Susnova

I have a working project written under KDS2.0, PE and MQX Lite.

 

I am trying to migrate it to KSDK1.3, KDS3.0 and MQX Lite - trying to get ready for a KW processor.

 

However, when using the Freescale OS abstraction layer and associated drivers, my project no longer fits into the RAM and ROM on the device (it did when I used KDS2.0, PE and MQXLite).

 

Is there a way to reduce the memory footprint (code and RAM) of code generated by KSDK3.0?

 

Any other ideas?

 

Thanks!

Outcomes