AnsweredAssumed Answered

Try i.MX6D and i.MX6DL performance under i.MX6Q

Question asked by Ruslan Kadyrov on Apr 1, 2013
Latest reply on Apr 1, 2013 by varsmolta

Greetings everyone,


We've recently tried i.MX6Q for our telecommunication project, and we are totally satisfied with it.

Moreover, we found some excessive performance for us: we use not more then 50% of its resource.

So we want to figure out if i.MX6D or i.MX6DL would be enough for us.


I tried to reduce my i.MX6Q cpu freq to 796MHz and set maxcpus=2 to U-boot bootargs.

It shows sufficient performance for our application.


Does it mean we can use i.MX6D or i.MX6DL instead of i.MX6Q, or some additional tests worth being done?


Thank in advance.