DI0_DISP_CLK on 1.8V or 2.775V? Schematics and datasheet contradict.

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

DI0_DISP_CLK on 1.8V or 2.775V? Schematics and datasheet contradict.

930 Views
sidebranch
Contributor II

We are designing an expansion board for the QSB for demo purposes.

In the IMX53QSB schematics (rev. D), in the expansion header description, the DISP0_DCLK signal has a "1.8V" label.

However, it directly connects to the IMX53 IPU DI0_DISP_CLK (pin H4), which according to the datasheet (rev. 4), is on the NVCC_LCD power rail. This is 2.775V.

What is correct, 1.8V or 2.775V?

The same question goes for GPIO_0 (CLK0)?

Labels (1)
0 Kudos
2 Replies

733 Views
NitinSonar
Contributor I

Hi,

We also did expansion board design and the said signals are at 2V7 level.

 

Best Regards

Nitin Sonar

0 Kudos

733 Views
fei_liu
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Hi, Leon

I think the DISP0_DCLK/GPIO_0 label on the connector is wrong.

DISP0_DCLK belongs to power rail: NVCC_LCD  which in 53QSB is 2.775V. 

GPIO_0 belongs to NVCC_GPIO. In 53QSB it's 3.3V.

Both of these two power rails can be set to other voltage level, such as 1.8V, depends on the interconnecting IO level.

0 Kudos