Issue about debugging TEE environment on i.MX8MQ using JLink Plus

70 Views

Hi. I'm new to NXP board and JLink.

I have the board "imx8mqevk", and I'm trying to debug TEE using JLink Plus and Segger Ozone.

The Feature of Jlink Plus I have is like :

SEGGER J-Link Commander V7.94g (Compiled Jan 24 2024 15:48:18)
DLL version V7.94g, compiled Jan 24 2024 15:48:07

Connecting to J-Link via USB...O.K.
Firmware: J-Link V10 compiled Jan 30 2023 11:28:07
Hardware version: V10.10
J-Link uptime (since boot): N/A (Not supported by this model)
S/N: XXXXXXXXX
License(s): RDI, FlashBP, FlashDL, JFlash, GDB
VTref=3.393V

As I know, the board has 4 cortex-A53 cores.

But, whenever I start the debugging session on Ozone and try debugging the board, it always gets into Kernel Panic due to SMP Preemption or cpu_idle something.

Linux says like :

[ 30.989659] Internal error: Oops - Undefined instruction: 0000000002000000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[ 30.998407] Modules linked in:
[ 31.001605] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.2.0-rc3-dirty #22
[ 31.008692] Hardware name: NXP i.MX8MQ EVK (DT)
[ 31.013422] pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[ 31.020690] pc : arch_cpu_idle+0x18/0x2c
[ 31.024797] lr : arch_cpu_idle+0x14/0x2c
[ 31.028898] sp : ffffffc00a1a3d70
[ 31.032358] x29: ffffffc00a1a3d70 x28: 0000000041fa80a0 x27: 00000000fdf63be0
[ 31.039814] x26: ffffffc00a1b4880 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000
[ 31.047271] x23: ffffffc00a1a9c1c x22: ffffffc009b52b78 x21: ffffffc00a1a9a68
[ 31.054731] x20: ffffffc00a1a9c10 x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000000
[ 31.062188] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000000000000000
[ 31.069643] x14: 00000000000002fe x13: 0000000000000001 x12: 0000000000000000
[ 31.077097] x11: 0000000000000001 x10: 0000000000000a40 x9 : ffffffc00a1a3cd0
[ 31.084552] x8 : ffffffc00a1b5320 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000010ed03ee
[ 31.092008] x5 : 4000000000000000 x4 : ffffffc0b3e2a000 x3 : 0000000000000000
[ 31.099463] x2 : 0000000000002c39 x1 : ffffff80bd97ac50 x0 : ffffffc008fd7c4c
[ 31.106923] Call trace:
[ 31.109479] arch_cpu_idle+0x18/0x2c
[ 31.113219] default_idle_call+0x30/0x6c
[ 31.117318] do_idle+0x244/0x2c0
[ 31.120696] cpu_startup_entry+0x28/0x30
[ 31.124794] kernel_init+0x0/0x12c
[ 31.128349] arch_post_acpi_subsys_init+0x0/0x18
[ 31.133174] start_kernel+0x658/0x698
[ 31.136998] __primary_switched+0xbc/0xc4
[ 31.141197] Code: d2801c00 910003fd 97fffff7 d50343ff (a8c17bfd)
[ 31.147561] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
[ 31.152393] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task!
[ 31.159389] SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
[ 31.163488] Kernel Offset: disabled
[ 31.167129] CPU features: 0x00000,01000108,0000421b
[ 31.172222] Memory Limit: none
[ 31.175416] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task! ]---

The Segger Ozone console says like:

File.Open ("/Users/xxxxxxx/Desktop/tee/xxxxxxxxx/tee.elf");

File.Open: completed in 182 ms

Program segments:

Address Size Code RO Data RW Data ZI Data Flg

--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---

FE000000 1 003 856 467 872 176 208 248 408 111 368 RWE

FE200000 0 0 0 0 0 RW

00000000 0 0 0 0 0 RW

--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---

Total: 1 003 856 467 872 176 208 248 408 111 368

--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---

For further information on ELF file data sections, execute command Elf.PrintSectionInfo(0).

Cannot break at symbol "main": symbol address could not be determined.

Invalid startup completion point "main": symbol address could not be determined.

Debug.ReadIntoInstCache: updated instruction information within 1 code ranges (0xFE000000-0xFE0723A0)

Debug.SetConnectMode (CM_ATTACH);

Debug.Start();

Device "CORTEX-A53" selected.

TotalIRLen = 4, IRPrint = 0x01

JTAG chain detection found 1 devices:

#0 Id: 0x5BA00477, IRLen: 04, CoreSight JTAG-DP

DPv0 detected

Scanning AP map to find all available APs

AP[5]: Stopped AP scan as end of AP map has been reached

AP[0]: AHB-AP (IDR: 0x64770001)

AP[1]: APB-AP (IDR: 0x44770002)

AP[2]: JTAG-AP (IDR: 0x24760010)

AP[3]: JTAG-AP (IDR: 0x001C0030)

AP[4]: AHB-AP (IDR: 0x24770011)

Iterating through AP map to find APB-AP to use

AP[0]: Skipped. Not an APB-AP

AP[1]: APB-AP found

No AP map specified by user. Setting auto-detected AP map.

Scanning ROMTbl @ 0x80000000

[0]Comp[0] @ 0x80400000: ROM Table

Scanning ROMTbl @ 0x80400000

[1]Comp[0] @ 0x80410000: Cortex-A53

[1]Comp[1] @ 0x80420000: CSS600-CTI

Core found. Stopped ROM table scan: https://wiki.segger.com/ROMTableScan

Cortex-A53 @ 0x80410000 (detected)

CoreCTI @ 0x80420000 (detected)

Debug architecture: ARMv8.0

6 code breakpoints, 4 data breakpoints

Processor features:

EL0 support: AArch64 + AArch32

EL1 support: AArch64 + AArch32

EL2 support: AArch64 + AArch32

EL3 support: AArch64 + AArch32

FPU support: Single + Double + Conversion

ARMv8-A/R: The connected J-Link (S/N 600101144) uses an old firmware module V0 with known problems / limitations.

Add. info (CPU temp. halted)

Current exception level: EL2

Exception level AArch usage:

EL0: AArch32

EL1: AArch32

EL2: AArch64

EL3: AArch64

Non-secure status: Non-secure

Cache info:

Inner cache boundary: L1

LoU Uniprocessor: 2

LoC: 0

LoU Inner Shareable: 2

I-Cache L1: 491 KB, 629 Sets, 32 Bytes/Line, 25-Way

VMSAv8-64: Supports 48-bit VAs

Connected to target device.

Startup complete (PC=0x00000001)

Memory access: CPU temp. halted: https://wiki.segger.com/Memory_accesses#Legacy_stop_mode

CPU could not be halted

I think there are lots of problems like memory access, CPU synchronization, Cache size that the debugging tool recognizing and etc...

As I think, the most suspicious thing on the log is "ARMv8-A/R: The connected J-Link (S/N 600101144) uses an old firmware module V0 with known problems / limitations."

So I've checked the firmware version of my JLink Plus, but the JLinkConfig says it has up-to-date FW version.

I think there isn't problem with building the image. because my coworker's environment can debug the board with same environment. the only thing that is different is JLink. As I said above, I'm using JLink Plus, but my coworker uses JLink(the basic one I think).

it has been about 3 months since I get into this issue ...

Is there anyone who has experienced like me?

Best Regards,
Bradley.

0 Replies