Hello NXP,
I am using the STKa117xL board from TQ. The board has an iMXRT1170 microcontroller on it and I want it to boot from OCRAM. The use case is that the code will be downloaded to Flash memory and upon POR, the ROM bootloader copies the relevant code from flash memory to OCRAM. The code will then start execution from OCRAM.
I went through the steps mentioned on https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-RT-Knowledge-Base/I-MX-RT-How-to-booting-to-SDRAM/ta-p/1125054 but they bore no fruit. Can you provide detailed documentation to achieve this? Any fuse bits that I need to configure?
Thanks,
Umair
已解决! 转到解答。
Yes, this is expected behavior. Some portion of OCRAM1 is used during startup so it also needs to be considered on the offset.
Best regards,
Omar
Hi @Omar_Anguiano ,
Thanks for your response. I tried that using the MCU Xpresso SDK and the MCU boot utility and it worked like a charm. Thanks for being helpful.
Now I have another question. I am using another IDE with GNU GCC toolchain to build bare-metal images (I am not using the NXP SDK). I have been able to successfully execute them via JTAG and they are also executing fine in-place (XIP) from flash also. So execution wise there is no problem, I am all set. But when I use that image (I stripped off the IVT and other headers because I know I don't need them for OCRAM boot) in the MCU boot utility, the output image doesn't boot. When I compare it with that generated using the MCU Xpresso SDK + MCU Boot, the boot header at 0x1000 is not correct (missing the entry point address at 0x1004 offset and some other differences also). May be, the MCU Xpresso generates some symbols in the .axf file that the MCU boot can parse and generate the bootable image accordingly. And since my GCC out file does not have those symbols, it does not work. Can you help me identify what I am missing here?
Thanks.
IVT is needed even if you´re using OCRAM. The image will be in flash but at boot time it will be copied to OCRAM so it executes from there.
Please refer to this post: Generating a Bootable Image for the RT1050 - NXP Community
Best regards,
Omar
Thank you @Omar_Anguiano for your response. Let me ask my question differently...
The question is that what is wrong in my procedure that the output is not the same as that of the axf file? Please help me with this. Thanks.
Thanks and Best Regard,
Umair Khan
Could you please describe the process to generate the bin file? MCUXpresso creates a binary with this command from an axf file:
It is expected for bin and axf to be different since axf also contains debug information.
So, both axf and bin file you loaded to MCUBoot are from the same image with the same parameters? I will be helpful if you detail to me how are you generating the bin file.
Best regards,
Omar
Hello @Omar_Anguiano . Thanks for the response.
I generated by bin file by right clicking the axf > Binary Utilities > Create binary as below:
And yes, both the axf and bin belong to the same project.
-Umair
Thank you for the information.
Could you please attach a screenshot of the values written in the following path of MCUXpresso:
Windows->Preferences->Utilities.
Additionally, which IDE version are you using?
Best regards,
Omar
Hi @Omar_Anguiano . Thanks for the response.
Below are the screenshots for both:
and
Thanks and BR,
Umair Khan
Thank you for the additional information.
I suggest you use the last IDE version to check if this issue still persists.
Additionally, when using the bin file on MCUBootUtility does an error display? Or the tool can write the image but does not run correctly during execution.
Best regards,
Omar
Thank you @Omar_Anguiano . No, the MCU boot does not throw any error when .bin file is used. It is as smooth as it is with the axf file. Here is the output log of the MCU boot:
'Generate Bootable Image' button is clicked
Bootable image is generated: C:\MCU_Boot_Utility\NXP-MCUBootUtility-master\gen\bootable_image\ivt_evkmimxrt1170_iled_blinky_cm7_unsigned.bin
Also, I am using version 3.5.0 of the MCU boot utility.
Umair
Thank you!
It will be helpful to check if this is persistent with the latest MCUXpresso version or using secure provisioning tool that works similarly to MCUBootUtility.
Best regards,
Omar
Hello @Omar_Anguiano .
I tried the secure provisioning tool and it works. The base address I was using in the MCU Boot utility was incorrect which was causing the problem. I first used the .axf file in the secure provisioning tool and it auto-populated the base address. There I realized that the base address setting was incorrect for MCU Boot utility. Now it works fine for the bin file as well.
I have another observation and a question. You suggested in your earlier comment to set the OCRAM_BASE to BASE + 0x3000 but I see that it does not boot until the offset is greater than or equal to 0x10000 (0x2025000). I tried below values but none worked:
However, below combinations work:
My question is that is it the expected behaviour?
Thanks.
Thanks @Omar_Anguiano . So it looks like we need to add a 0x3000 offset after the reserved RAM space. From the figure you attached, the correct address comes out to be 0x2024BFFFF + 0x3000 = 0x2024FFFF which is what I observed.
Anyway, thanks for the continued support. This answers my question.
The steps are the same as using an internal RAM
1. Select Project > Properties - C/C++ Build > Settings > Tool Settings > MCULinker > Managed Linker Script and check Link application to RAM.
2. In Project > Properties > C/C++ Build > MCU settings, delete Flash, and modify SRAM_OCRAM to start at (BASE + 0x3000) with size (SIZE - 0x3000).
3. Move SRAM_OCRAM to the first position to make it default.
4. Build the image.
Then you can use MCUBootUtility to load that image.
Best regards,
Omar
Hi Omar,
I'm very sorry but it's still not clear what to do. I'm using the same baseboard as the thread starter and I'd like to start my program from SRAM, too (because network speed is much faster).
Do you mean with "modify SRAM_OCRAM to start at (BASE + 0x3000)" that I should change the Location of SRAM_OC1 to 0x20243000 and the size to 0x7d000 (for the RT1176)? It's very hard to follow if you're using different terms for the things I should change in the IDE.
OK, link to RAM checked, I build my image. But what follows after that? Flashing the .axf file with the Secure Provisioning Tool leads to a non-booting program. I can't change the start address in this case.
If I create a bin file from the .axf in the IDE then it is possible to change the start address in the provisioning tool but it doesn't allow a start address of 0x2024ffff:
"ERROR: Incorrect address value or invalid image content. Invalid image start address. Based on the detected application entry point address 0x202434CD and image size 418484, the start address shall be in range 0x201DD219-0x202434CD."
So, do I use the MCUBootUtility for this purpose? Or is it possible to use the secure provisioning tool, too? What settings do I have to use?
Unfortunately the MCUBootUtility does not work on my computer (it does not find the correct USB-IDs) although the secure provisiong tool works without a problem.
The information about this subject is very hard to find as it is spread over various MCUs or maybe includes outdated information.
Please give me some hints!
Bye,
Oliver
Hi @jay_heng . Thank you for your response.
We have tried the MCU Boot Utility but our board is not booting from OCRAM. Do you have a demo application and documented set of steps for OCRAM boot?
Thanks.