can't understand this bit of a RM

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

can't understand this bit of a RM

Jump to solution
78 Views
Pencioner
Contributor II

I can't understand a bit of a LPSPI FRAMESZ description from the RT1060 Reference Manual rev. 3 (see screenshot)

So, previously it says that LPSPI word size is 32bit and i don't see any configuration for it, so how then it says that minimum word size is 2 bit.
Statement that frame size of 33 bits is not supported - is it just this value, 33 bit, somehow special, or any other (n * wordsize) + 1 is too (f.e. 65 or 97 frame size?)

Thanks in advance!

Labels (1)
0 Kudos
Reply
1 Solution
41 Views
Gavin_Jia
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

Hi @Pencioner ,

Thanks for your interest in NXP MIMXRT series!

1. The minimum word length here means that the remainder of the frame length divided by 32 cannot be 1. This is a hardware reason and does not need to be configured manually. 

2. Therefore, it also means that 33bit is not supported, similarly, the 65,97bit you mentioned is also not supported.

Hope it helps!

Best regards,
Gavin

View solution in original post

4 Replies
77 Views
Pencioner
Contributor II

screenshot19.png

P.S. found a way to inline an image, this is the same as i have attached

0 Kudos
Reply
42 Views
Gavin_Jia
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

Hi @Pencioner ,

Thanks for your interest in NXP MIMXRT series!

1. The minimum word length here means that the remainder of the frame length divided by 32 cannot be 1. This is a hardware reason and does not need to be configured manually. 

2. Therefore, it also means that 33bit is not supported, similarly, the 65,97bit you mentioned is also not supported.

Hope it helps!

Best regards,
Gavin

35 Views
Pencioner
Contributor II

Hi, yes now this makes sense - so it is a minimum word size for the incomplete word which is last word in the frame. I believe if you have this statement in this and maybe other RMs it would be good to somehow express it in different words so it would be easier to get it

 

Thanks a lot!

0 Kudos
Reply
53 Views
Littell
Contributor III
Hahaha, what a joke! Welcome to the wonderful world of modern "documentation", your choices are either "missing/incomplete" or "so horribly written as to be virtually impenetrable".

Dear God how I miss Motorola-era documentation. It's been all downhill since then.
0 Kudos
Reply