iMX6 - CPU frequency lowered during LDO bypass setting

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

iMX6 - CPU frequency lowered during LDO bypass setting

Jump to solution
1,702 Views
Ansari
Contributor IV

Hi,

We are using imx6Q sabresd platform for our development with Linux 3.14.28_1.0.0-GA BSP but initially we used Linux 3.10.17_1.0.0-GA BSP.

We have gone through below files from Linux 3.14.28_1.0.0-GA(File-1) and Linux 3.10.17_1.0.0-GA (FIle-2) BSPs.

File-1: ~/u-boot-imx/board/freescale/mx6sabresd/mx6sabresd.c

File-2: ~/u-boot-imx/board/freescale/mx6qsabresd/mx6qsabresd.c

We could see some changes are added in File-1(compare to File-2).

In below function, we understood that the CPU frequency is lowered to 400Mhz before doing the LDO bypass and CPU frequency is increased to 800Mhz after the LDO bypass settings.

"ldo_mode_set"

In FIle-2 (Linux 3.10.17_1.0.0-GA), the below function will do the LDO bypass settings without changing the CPU frequency.

"ldo_mode_set"

We would like to know, during the LDO bypass settings why the CPU frequency is lowered in File-1(Linux 3.14.28_1.0.0-GA)?  Is it recommended  to do the same.?

Thank You,

Regards,

Ansari

0 Kudos
Reply
1 Solution
1,070 Views
andreascian
Contributor III

Dear Igor,

by looking inside u-boot code and the commits from FSL engineer, it seems that the older implementation is a violation of datasheet power constraint

I've search for some details inside the code/datasheet and I found the some information I sent to Abdul in meta-freescale mailing list:

https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale/2015-April/013447.html

WDYT about that?

Kind Regards,

Andrea

View solution in original post

0 Kudos
Reply
4 Replies
1,070 Views
Ansari
Contributor IV

Dear Igor and Andrea,

Thank you for your valuable inputs.

Regards,

Ansari

0 Kudos
Reply
1,070 Views
igorpadykov
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Hi Abdul

CPU frequencylowering during the LDO bypass is not requirement,

but it provides less power spikes, so gives more board stability.

Best regards

igor

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

0 Kudos
Reply
1,071 Views
andreascian
Contributor III

Dear Igor,

by looking inside u-boot code and the commits from FSL engineer, it seems that the older implementation is a violation of datasheet power constraint

I've search for some details inside the code/datasheet and I found the some information I sent to Abdul in meta-freescale mailing list:

https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale/2015-April/013447.html

WDYT about that?

Kind Regards,

Andrea

0 Kudos
Reply
1,070 Views
igorpadykov
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Hi Andrea

I think these considerations are quite reasonable.

Best regards

igor

0 Kudos
Reply