i.MX8m-mini DRAM Controller

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

i.MX8m-mini DRAM Controller

Jump to solution
489 Views
JamesShih
Contributor III

Hi,

I followed the linux ref manual 2.5.4 and able to control the bus frequency, but it seems like not control the DRAM controller directly, correct?

If yes, what if I would like to control the DRAM Controller directly? Or I can do both at the same time?

Thanks.

James Shih

Labels (1)
0 Kudos
Reply
1 Solution
455 Views
pengyong_zhang
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Hi @JamesShih

NXP vendor tree is using a private busfreq [1] driver to do ddr and bus fabric scalling rather than using upstream ddrc & interconnect
driver which is still immature. And actually there's no i.MX driver users of ICC in current vendor kernel. So removing them in order to avoid confusing to customers

B.R

View solution in original post

0 Kudos
Reply
4 Replies
456 Views
pengyong_zhang
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Hi @JamesShih

NXP vendor tree is using a private busfreq [1] driver to do ddr and bus fabric scalling rather than using upstream ddrc & interconnect
driver which is still immature. And actually there's no i.MX driver users of ICC in current vendor kernel. So removing them in order to avoid confusing to customers

B.R

0 Kudos
Reply
444 Views
JamesShih
Contributor III
Thanks, it's clear for me now.
0 Kudos
Reply
484 Views
pengyong_zhang
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Hi @JamesShih 

What do you mean control the DRAM Controller directly? please explain more details

B.R

0 Kudos
Reply
471 Views
JamesShih
Contributor III
Hi Pengyong,

Sorry for the incomplete information, the DRAM Controller I mean is the DDR Controller.

Right now in my environment, I'm able to use "busfreq" to set DDR and NOC to the lower frequency and for sure able to see the power consumption going down.

Beside, there is another one called "devfreq", I tried to enable it in my environment, but unfortunately it didn't work and even not able to see the node.

To clarify my question, I just want to confirm if in the same clock (lower frequency) condition by either busfreq or devfreq, from the power consumption point of view it shouldn't be any different, correct?

Hopefully it's clear for you to understand my question, thanks.
0 Kudos
Reply