Thank you for your suggestion. Before posting my question to the community, I did indeed review my setup for the system I am using, and performed several sanity checks I will detail below...
As for the document you mention "Freescale_Yocto_Project_User's_Guide.pdf" - I do not find a document by that name. The most relevant document I did find is: https://community.freescale.com/servlet/JiveServlet/previewBody/95096-102-10-7847/yocto_tutorial.pdf, but that seemed to mostly focus on making Kernel changes by adding a layer, and I am reasonably clear on that side of the equation. I found nothing toward building previous Kernel or Root File System images there, so if there is a document you attempted to point me to which does have relevant information, please provide a link or a Freescale document number, thanks.
I had hoped that a simple and direct question might yield a simple and direct answer, so I had omitted a few obvious sanity checks I have made to be sure that Yocto is basically working correctly, let me share them for clarity:
I have built the default image for the SabreLite, which uses u-boot 2014.07 and Linux-boundary 3.10.17, and its default filesystem, I have tested this on my demo Boundary Devices iMX6q SabreLite platform, and it works.
I have also built the default image for the Freescale iMX6q SabreSD and have tested that image on my demo SabreSD platform, and it works also.
I have tested the (core-image-base) root filesystem generated when I built Linux-boundary 3.0.35 with the SabreLite board using the 3.10.17 Kernel, and this works fine, which is what leads me to consider an incompatibility with the 3.0.35 Kernel and this Yocto generated file system image.
Now, to re-iterate, the 3.0.35 Kernel boots to a prompt and works fine with the root file system generated by the old LTIB toolchain, which demonstrates with a reasonable degree of confidence that this 3.0.35 Kernel is, indeed functional.
The fact that the Yocto generated root filesytem works with 3.10.17 and not with 3.0.35 leads me to believe that the generation of the root file system under Yocto is incompatible with the 3.0.35 Kernel.
And, so, I return to my original, simple, and direct question. If anyone has successfully built a 3.0.35 Kernel with a root file system generated by Yocto which executes under the 3.0.35 Kernel, I would deeply appreciate your sharing the configuration/recipe elements you have in your recipes and layers to generate that root file system.
I do believe that I am likely missing a simple step, which is causing Yocto to generate an incompatible image - seeing a recipe/configuration which works will likely reveal my missed ingredient, as it were...