Regarding i.MX6DQ POR_B input.

キャンセル
次の結果を表示 
表示  限定  | 次の代わりに検索 
もしかして: 

Regarding i.MX6DQ POR_B input.

ソリューションへジャンプ
1,805件の閲覧回数
satoshishimoda
Senior Contributor I

Hi community,

Our customer have a question about i.MX6 POR_B.
They know the restriction "SRC_POR_B rise/fall times must be 5ns or less" to POR_B slew rate have been removed from datasheet (IMX6DQCEC Rev.4).
So they understand there is no restriction to POR_B slew rate, and there is input hysteresis to prevent chattering.
Is their understanding correct?

If correct, would you let me know the input hysteresis spec?


Best Regards,
Satoshi Shimoda

ラベル(2)
タグ(1)
0 件の賞賛
返信
1 解決策
1,600件の閲覧回数
igorpadykov
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Hi Satoshi

hysteresis is 250 mV according to Table 22. GPIO I/O DC Parameters

i.MX6DQ Datasheet

http://cache.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/data_sheet/IMX6DQCEC.pdf

Best regards
igor
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

元の投稿で解決策を見る

0 件の賞賛
返信
3 返答(返信)
1,601件の閲覧回数
igorpadykov
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Hi Satoshi

hysteresis is 250 mV according to Table 22. GPIO I/O DC Parameters

i.MX6DQ Datasheet

http://cache.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/data_sheet/IMX6DQCEC.pdf

Best regards
igor
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

0 件の賞賛
返信
1,600件の閲覧回数
satoshishimoda
Senior Contributor I

Dear Igor,

Thank you for your prompt reply.

OK, I understood about hysteresis.

And would you give us your reply whether the following our customer's understanding is correct or not also?

"So they understand there is no restriction to POR_B slew rate"

In fact, the POR_B slew rate on their custom board is very slow.

About 500ms is needed to rise the POR_B from 0V to VIH (2.1V).

They think it is OK since the restriction has been removed from datasheet.

Is it OK? or faster slew rate is required?

Best Regards,

Satoshi Shimoda

0 件の賞賛
返信
1,600件の閲覧回数
igorpadykov
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Hi Satoshi 

please refer to footnote 3 Table 22 :

To maintain a valid level, the transition edge of the input must sustain a constant slew rate (monotonic) from the current DC
level through to the target DC level, Vil or Vih. Monotonic input transition time is from 0.1 ns to 1 s.

So seems 500ms is ok.

Best regards
igor