IMX93x : Can MIPI-CSI2 generate an interrupt triggered by an FS/FE packet?

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

IMX93x : Can MIPI-CSI2 generate an interrupt triggered by an FS/FE packet?

Jump to solution
1,714 Views
takayuki_ishii
Contributor IV

Hello community,

 

I hope to detect FS and FE packet receive timing on MIPI-CSI2.

Can an interrupt be triggered by an FS/FE packet in MIPI-CSI2 of IMX93?

 

I could not find it in the interrupt flag registers described in the reference manual rev2.0.

 

By the way, main interrupt status. (INT_ST_MAIN), there are 10 valid interrupt flags

for sub modules of MIPI-CSI2.

  1. status_int_ipi_fatal[18]
  2. status_int_phy[16]
  3. status_int_ecc_corrected[7]
  4. status_int_data_id[6]
  5. status_int_pld_crc_fatal[5]
  6. status_int_crc_frame_fatal[4]
  7. status_int_seq_frame_fatal[3]
  8. status_int_bndry_frame_fatal[2]
  9. status_int_pkt_fata[1]
  10. status_int_phy_fatal[0]

But only 4 of the 10 submodule registers are described in register map of Reference Manual.

  1. 54.5.1.31 Fatal Interruption Caused by PHY (INT_ST_PHY_FATAL)
  2. 54.5.1.34 Fatal Interruption Caused During Packet Construction (INT_ST_PKT_FATAL)
  3. 54.5.1.37 Interruption Caused by PHY (INT_ST_PHY)
  4. 54.5.1.40 Fatal Interruption Caused by IPI Interface (INT_ST_IPI_FATAL)

 

Are there any interrupts triggered by FS/FE in the remaining 6 interrupt factors

that do not have register descriptions?

 

Best regards,

Ishii.

Labels (1)
Tags (1)
0 Kudos
Reply
1 Solution
1,533 Views
Bio_TICFSL
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

Hello,

I checked with design about whether i.MX93 MIPI CSI has such FS/FE interrupt, unfortunately, there is no MIPI CSI interrupt about it. He mentioned there is an interrupt in ISI named as below that could do similar function:

Bio_TICFSL_0-1691677294656.jpeg

 

It means whether the frame is stored successfully into memory. Although it is different with when MIPI CSI receive frame start/end packet, they could take a reference. 

Regards

View solution in original post

0 Kudos
Reply
5 Replies
1,657 Views
Bio_TICFSL
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

Hello,

"With Line Interrupt Ratio" to 0x1. this setting, the LINE_END interrupt will be raised each time the Line End packet is detected on a specific MIPI CSI2 lane.

Regards

 

0 Kudos
Reply
1,600 Views
takayuki_ishii
Contributor IV

Hello @Bio_TICFSL 

 

Thank you for your answerd..

And sorry my late reply.

 

I read your reply and search bits to set Line interrupt Ratio and LINE_END interrupt bit.

But I could not find those register bits.

 

1) In which register is "With Line Interrupt Ratio" located?

2) Where is the LINE_END interrupt?

LINE_RCVD_EN bit in 57.7.6 Channel Interrupt Enable (CHNL_IER) is correct?

 

I hope to know each interrupt of Frame Start(FS) and Frame End(FE) packet received timing.

If it set "Line Interrupt Ratio" = 1, LINE_END interrupt generate each Frame Start timing?

 

Best regards,

Ishii.

 

0 Kudos
Reply
1,543 Views
Bio_TICFSL
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

Hello,

From i.MX93 MIPI CSI RM, I haven't seen such interrupt that could indicates frame start or frame end MIPI CSI receives. Let me check with R&D if there is a way to get it. Will reply later.

regards

0 Kudos
Reply
1,534 Views
Bio_TICFSL
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

Hello,

I checked with design about whether i.MX93 MIPI CSI has such FS/FE interrupt, unfortunately, there is no MIPI CSI interrupt about it. He mentioned there is an interrupt in ISI named as below that could do similar function:

Bio_TICFSL_0-1691677294656.jpeg

 

It means whether the frame is stored successfully into memory. Although it is different with when MIPI CSI receive frame start/end packet, they could take a reference. 

Regards

0 Kudos
Reply
1,489 Views
takayuki_ishii
Contributor IV

Hello @Bio_TICFSL 

 

Thank you for your reply.

I understand that MIPI-CSI module has no interrupt status signal.

But it is replaced by the ISI status signal, which does not exactly match.

 

Best regards,

Ishii.

0 Kudos
Reply