Hi,
I wonder what is the real impact of bt mode on csi input rate:
In imx53RM manual at page 546, CSI input rate is said to be 135MP/s in BT1120 an d 67 MP/s in BT656, in 4:2:2.
Now at page 2633 in IPU chapter, CSI input rate is said to be 45Mp/s in 4:2:2, whether the bt mode is, it seems.
So, what input rate is to be considered ? Is it really possible to reach 135 MP/s in on-the-fly processing with BT1120 ?
Christophe
I recommend that you can consider to calculate the required frequency as the followings:
F = FH * FW * FPS * BI * DF
Where
• FH = frame height (in pixels)
• FW = Frame width (in pixels)
• fps = frame rate (frames per second)
• BI = typically 35% overhead, should be assumed as 1.35. The actual blanking
intervals are a parameter of the attached device.
• DF = data format, defines the number of cycles needed to send a single pixel.
The number of cycles needed to send a single pixel depends on the interface and the data
format.
Data format examples:
• YUV422 over 16 bit = 1 cycles/pixel
• RGB888 over 8 bit = 1 cycle/pixel
• RGB565 over 16 bit = 2 cycles/pixel
• Bayer/Generic data = 1 cycle/pixel
• YUV422 over 8 bit = 2 cycles/pixel
• BT.656, YUV422 format = 2 cycles/pixel
• BT.1120, YUV422 format = 1 cycle/pixel
Now i see where comes the 1,5 factor: ~1/(1-0.35).
Thanks.
Christophe.
Hello, Christophe:
Glad to see it’s helpful.
Hi Christophe,
The maximum transfer rate must take account the interface bit width.
For a YUV4:2:2 (16 bits) format used over a 16 bits interface, the bandwidth will be: 135M/1,5 = 90M Pixels/sec
For a YUV4:2:2 (16 bits) format used over a 8 bits interface, it will take 2 cycles per bit to perform a 16 bits value. The bandwidth will be: 135M/(1,5*2) = 45M Pixels/sec
Rgds
Rogerio
Hi Rogerio,
I agree with you for the secondth point, but not the first:
In 4:2:2, you receive (Y0,Cr0) at n and (Y1,Cb0) at n+1, so 2 samples of 8 bits at each clock period, packed into one 16 bits sample. Moreover, the spec says 135 MP/s in 4:2:2. So the bandwidth must be 135 MP/s or 270 Mo/s.
So could you explain the 1,5 factor.
Rgds,
Christophe.