T2080 Virtualization Support

キャンセル
次の結果を表示 
表示  限定  | 次の代わりに検索 
もしかして: 

T2080 Virtualization Support

1,224件の閲覧回数
siddalingaprasa
Contributor I

Hi All,

I am pretty new to Linux, but we want to use T2080/2081 (e6500 core) in our custom board and we would like to run Linux as Host OS and VxWorks 5.4 as guest OS. VxWorks5.4 is 32 bit and is built for e500 core as we previously had MPC85xx (e500 core) based board. So my question is on the core/processor emulation. Should the Guest OS processor/core be emulated using QEMU for e500? If this is true, then all the VM instructions will trap into Host OS and there will be a huge performance penalty. Does KVM provide other means which it can exploit the T2081 hardware features so that we can overcome the bottleneck of processor/core emulation? Something like a pass-through from Guest to Physical core?

-Thanks and Regards,

Prasad.

ラベル(1)
0 件の賞賛
返信
2 返答(返信)

847件の閲覧回数
bpe
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

When you say KVM, you already mean  most instructions are executed natively, not interpreted.

Only a few privileged instructions cause traps.

A basic description of what and how is emulated can be found here:

https://freescale.sdlproducts.com/LiveContent/content/en-US/QorIQ_SDK/GUID-9DEF2E13-2F31-47DC-8D38-D...

Refer to the VCPU specification Sections 2 and 3 for full details:

http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/E500_virtual_CPU_specification

A discussion of  overheads introduced by KVM can be found here:

https://freescale.sdlproducts.com/LiveContent/content/en-US/QorIQ_SDK/GUID-8ADAFC19-511D-48E5-9F95-6...


Have a great day,

Platon

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

0 件の賞賛
返信

847件の閲覧回数
siddalingaprasa
Contributor I

Thanks for the information Platon.

-Regards,

Prasad.

0 件の賞賛
返信