How to use CodeWarrior for PowerPC Architecture 10.5.1 to flash U-boot for the T1013 processor BareB

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

How to use CodeWarrior for PowerPC Architecture 10.5.1 to flash U-boot for the T1013 processor BareB

637 Views
letisl
Contributor I

Hello, I use a T1013 processor and CodeWarrior for PowerPC Architecture 10.5.1 (CW PA) software, and I want to burn U-boot on a BareBoard, so I use Hard-coded RCW and create a BareBoard project in CW PA:

letisl_0-1742781941695.pngletisl_1-1742781946140.pngletisl_2-1742781948672.pngletisl_3-1742781951015.png

 

My hardware configuration is different from T1013RDB (I can't find the T1013RDB information on the NXP website, I can only judge by the .tcl and .mem files in the example project), I didn't modify the .tcl and .mem files, tried to debug directly, but found that there are only two ways to connect to the processor through JTAG:

letisl_4-1742781971534.png

 

If you connect using a different method (apart from two "Attach" targets) , you get an error:

letisl_5-1742782046652.png

 

When using RUN instead of Debug (Including two "Attach" targets), an error is prompted:

letisl_6-1742782100703.png

 


I noticed that the CW PA software would say "Reset failed".

In the meantime, when I connect to the processor with a RAM_Attach, I read the value of the register, but find that the value of the CCSR register configured in the .tcl does not work at all:

letisl_7-1742782115202.png

 

What should I do to finish burning U-boot on the new board, what may be the cause of the above problems I am experiencing? How should it be resolved?

0 Kudos
Reply
1 Reply

602 Views
yipingwang
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

Please refer to the following document to do flash programming.

https://community.nxp.com/t5/CodeWarrior-Development-Tools/Flash-Programmer-for-CodeWarrior-Power-Ar...

In addition, it seems that there is JTAG interface hardware design problem on your custom board.

Please refer to the attached PPT.

0 Kudos
Reply