Advantages of SE050 over SmartMX3 for Secure Identification?

キャンセル
次の結果を表示 
表示  限定  | 次の代わりに検索 
もしかして: 

Advantages of SE050 over SmartMX3 for Secure Identification?

1,498件の閲覧回数
nandanito
Contributor I

If the requirement of the use case is to solely identify the hardware, how does SE050 differentiates from SmartMX3 Secure Controllers?

Even Common Criteria Evaluation Documentation puts P71 (SmartMX3 Controller) and SE050 under similar testing environment. 

Link to it: https://www.commoncriteriaportal.org/files/epfiles/[ST-LITE]%20JCOP4_P71_SecurityTargetLite_v3.4.pdf 

I would appreciate, if anyone notifies the actual difference between these two solutions.

Thanks!

ラベル(1)
0 件の賞賛
返信
1 返信

1,404件の閲覧回数
Kan_Li
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

SE050 has more IO option, for example, I2C interface, GPIO, power switch...

Have a great day,
Kan


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note:
- If this post answers your question, please click the "Mark Correct" button. Thank you!
- We are following threads for 7 weeks after the last post, later replies are ignored
Please open a new thread and refer to the closed one, if you have a related question at a later point in time.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

0 件の賞賛
返信