Diagnostic Coverage of SM4.FLASH.PGM_ERS_CONTENT

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Diagnostic Coverage of SM4.FLASH.PGM_ERS_CONTENT

921 Views
WeoWang
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Hi Dear Colleagues,

I found that in FMEDA, the DC(Diagnostic Coverage) of SM4.FLASH.PGM_ERS_CONTENT is 90%,

WeoWang_0-1695093531173.png

While in ISO26262-5, table D.4 clause D.2.3.7, the typical diagnostic coverage considered achievable is high, which stands for 99%,

WeoWang_1-1695093765721.png

 

So why is the DC of SM4.FLASH.PGM_ERS_CONTENT 90%, not 99%?

Thanks.

Best Regards

Weo Wang

0 Kudos
1 Reply

822 Views
ehtesham_khan
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Hi Weo Wang,

For SM4.FLASH.PGM_ERS_CONTENT we took pessimistic approach and kept it's diagnostic coverage to 90%. We keep this practice for many other SM4s as they are implemented by customers. This is done to be on safe side.
If customer is able to implement the safety mechanism as recommended by ISO26262, then it can be increased to 99%. 

Regards,
Ehtesham

0 Kudos