Master Core

キャンセル
次の結果を表示 
表示  限定  | 次の代わりに検索 
もしかして: 
1,055件の閲覧回数
HeebeomPark
Contributor II

For the following assumption requirement, master safety core is used , which is Core 2.
However Core 2 is aligned with Lockstep(Core1) and it is more secured. So instead of using Core 2, can Core 0 is used for the following requirement?

 

Software assumption
The application software running on the master safety core manages the FCCU failure status and interrupts.

Rationale
Ensures consistency with the safety concept.

Recommendation
NXP solution: Use the S32 Safety Software Framework (eMCEM module).

0 件の賞賛
1 解決策
841件の閲覧回数
john_floros
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Hello,

It is appropriate to use Core0 as the master safety core as long as it is in lockstep with Core1 on the S32k388.

Regards,

John

元の投稿で解決策を見る

0 件の賞賛
1 返信
842件の閲覧回数
john_floros
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Hello,

It is appropriate to use Core0 as the master safety core as long as it is in lockstep with Core1 on the S32k388.

Regards,

John

0 件の賞賛