This is the query based on the customer.
I have downloaded RM of S32K3XX and got the Interrupt mapping in excel format, but in that excel, microcontroller S32K324 is not present
Attached an image for the reference where S32K324 MCU is not available.
Any specific reason behind that? If it is intentional, shall we consider S32K324 with S32K344?
Waiting for the valuable response.
Thanks & regards,
Krishnakumar V
Hi @Krish1510
There is a typo in the document. As shown in the image you shared, S32K341 appears twice. The second instance located between S32K314 and S32K344 should actually be S32K324. I have already informed the appropriate team, and they will raise a ticket to ensure this is corrected in future revisions.
Additionally, it is worth noting that in this case, the information provided for S32K344 also applies to S32K324. So yes, you can consider S32K324 equivalent to S32K344 for the purposes of this context.
BR, VaneB
Hello,
It is true that the S32K344 can be used for the S32K324. One exception is that Vector 59 for SWT1 on the S32K324 would not be considered reserved but instead supported. See below from RM.
The excel file in the RM needs to be updated. Is there a date when the RM will be updated with the excel file corrected?
Regards,
John