glork wrote:
it looks like an absolute mess to me and I don't generally trust something that complicated (just general principle).
Al wrote:
It's hard to believe that Freescale doesn't have better support for this UF32 (more examples-that work, better documentation for USB-section 5 left out!).
All together this discussion doesn't make a good impression of Freescale, but I have some comments. And glork, I believe we all trust many things more complicated than that... you may not know it because they are hidden in 'black boxes', and we typically feel strangely comfortable only because we are not controlling them

I think the UF32 is probably really good for anyone who learns it inside and out. IMHO the problem is usually just that a developer doesn't see the whole picture (i.e. what was intended by the design), or doesn't already know about the subject, in this case USB. That leads to my question to Al:
Al, why is it hard to believe that Freescale doesn't have better support for this UF32? This is the absolute
norm for their documentation which has been discussed repeatedly since long before Frescale was distinguished from Motorola. I should mention I've seen better improvements just recently (last two years).
So I plan to learn more about the subject from other sources also, maybe
http://www.lvr.com/usb.htmhttp://www.hitex.co.uk/usb/usbtutorial.html 
sorry not useful for many of us )
http://www.techtutorials.info/usb.htmlMessage Edited by imajeff on 05-05-200608:27 AM