- Home
- :
- NXP Model-Based Design Tools
- :
- NXP Model-Based Design Tools for RADAR
- :
- Re: 1024 FFT for SPT simulation issues with model ...

Turn on suggestions

Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page

SOLVED

09-27-2019
12:54 AM

418 Views

morrisli

Contributor I

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

I tried to simulate 1024 FFT using model base design toolbox.

The twiddle factor was generated by following code

NFFT =1024

for mm = 0:1:(NFFT-1)

theta = (-2*pi*mm*1/NFFT);

twiddle(mm+1) = cos(theta) + (1i*(sin(theta)));

end

twiddle = twiddle*0.99997*2^15;

The window function was generate as following

win = chebwin(NFFT,100);

win = round(win*0.99998*2^15).';

A cos signal with 10* time of frequency resolution (delta_f) was used as test signal;

NFFT =1024;

fs = 20.e6;

delt_f = fs/NFFT;

f1 = 10* delt_f;

S = cos(2*pi*f1*[0:NFFT-1]/fs + (rand * 2 *pi)) * (0.25);

S = round(S * 2^11);

S = S .* 2^2;

Then it was passed to spt functions to simulate 1024 FFT results by following

quad_ext_fft = 'QUAD_EXT';

win_out = win_mex(complex(win),complex(S),'MULTIPLE_COEFF',0);

Stage_0 = rdx4_mex(twiddle, win_out,'WIN_DISABLED','MULTIPLE_COEFF',0,quad_ext_fft,'NO_COMBINED_FFT',0);

Stage_1 = rdx4_mex(twiddle, Stage_0,'WIN_DISABLED','MULTIPLE_COEFF',1,quad_ext_fft,'NO_COMBINED_FFT',0);

Stage_2 = rdx4_mex(twiddle, Stage_1,'WIN_DISABLED','MULTIPLE_COEFF',2,quad_ext_fft,'NO_COMBINED_FFT',0);

Stage_3 = rdx4_mex(twiddle, Stage_2,'WIN_DISABLED','MULTIPLE_COEFF',3,quad_ext_fft,'NO_COMBINED_FFT',0);

Stage_4 = rdx4_mex(twiddle, Stage_3,'WIN_DISABLED','MULTIPLE_COEFF',4,quad_ext_fft,'NO_COMBINED_FFT',0);

However, it could not get correct peak at Stage_4 output. The results was following

Is anything I forgot or missed ?

Solved! Go to Solution.

1 Solution

09-27-2019
04:55 AM

186 Views

iulianbulancea

NXP Employee

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Hello morrisli,

I attached a m script that has as starting point your code. The main problem was with twiddle factors. When you use quadrature extension, the first has to be cos(2*pi*1/NFFT)-sin(2*pi*1/NFFT), and you need only one eighth of them. Also you can apply the window in the first round of a radix 4 instruction, like this:

Stage_0 = rdx4_mex(complex(win), complex(S), 'WIN_ENABLED', 'MULTIPLE_COEFF', 0, 'QUAD_EXT', 'NO_COMBINED_FFT', 0);

Kind regards,

Iulian Bulancea

1 Reply

09-27-2019
04:55 AM

187 Views

iulianbulancea

NXP Employee

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Hello morrisli,

I attached a m script that has as starting point your code. The main problem was with twiddle factors. When you use quadrature extension, the first has to be cos(2*pi*1/NFFT)-sin(2*pi*1/NFFT), and you need only one eighth of them. Also you can apply the window in the first round of a radix 4 instruction, like this:

Stage_0 = rdx4_mex(complex(win), complex(S), 'WIN_ENABLED', 'MULTIPLE_COEFF', 0, 'QUAD_EXT', 'NO_COMBINED_FFT', 0);

Kind regards,

Iulian Bulancea