lwadc vs adc?

キャンセル
次の結果を表示 
表示  限定  | 次の代わりに検索 
もしかして: 
671件の閲覧回数
ryangittens
Contributor I

Can someone explain what's the difference between the lwadc and the adc on the MQX RTOS? Why is it quicker to use lwadc?

Any help is appreciated.

タグ(3)
0 件の賞賛
返信
1 解決策
512件の閲覧回数
soledad
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Hello Ryan,

You should look into MQX IO Drivers Users Guide, where both options are described, and select the one that you like more.

LW means less CPU overhead, less features. Less features might be enough for most applications.

However, for adc, my recommendation is to use the lwadc. These lw io drivers are better and more usable.


Have a great day,
Sol

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

元の投稿で解決策を見る

0 件の賞賛
返信
1 返信
513件の閲覧回数
soledad
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Hello Ryan,

You should look into MQX IO Drivers Users Guide, where both options are described, and select the one that you like more.

LW means less CPU overhead, less features. Less features might be enough for most applications.

However, for adc, my recommendation is to use the lwadc. These lw io drivers are better and more usable.


Have a great day,
Sol

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

0 件の賞賛
返信