Dear David,
We have tried to install the suggested patch. But it has not solved the problem.
As our team is new on such programming, pls advise how to check 'heap low address and the heap high address against the memory address 0x20000000 to see whether the global variables reside on that address' ?
Some one has advise to work with MQX 4.1.0. Shall we try with MQX 4.1.0 ?
We also come to know that RAM is divided into TWO blocks of 64K each. Hence variables should not straddling the 64k boundary. Also read and write function can not span the 64k boundary between 2 blocks ? Is this true ?
regds,
Dinesh
From: DavidS <admin@community.freescale.com>
To: Dinesh Sonagra <rnd.himson@yahoo.co.in>
Sent: Friday, 12 February 2016 9:22 PM
Subject: Re: - Use of RAM beyond 64KB in K60 controller with MQX 4.2.0
#yiv3047704310 * #yiv3047704310 a #yiv3047704310 body {font-family:Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;}#yiv3047704310 #yiv3047704310 h1, #yiv3047704310 h2, #yiv3047704310 h3, #yiv3047704310 h4, #yiv3047704310 h5, #yiv3047704310 h6, #yiv3047704310 p, #yiv3047704310 hr {}#yiv3047704310 .yiv3047704310button td {}
|
|
Use of RAM beyond 64KB in K60 controller with MQX 4.2.0
reply from David E Seymour in MQX Software Solutions - View the full discussionHi Dinesh,Did the patch help?You should not have to change the linker file.Regards,David
Reply to this message by replying to this email, or go to the message on NXP Community |
Start a new discussion in MQX Software Solutions by email or at NXP Community |
Following Use of RAM beyond 64KB in K60 controller with MQX 4.2.0 in these streams: Inbox |
This email was sent by NXP Community because you are a registered user.
You may unsubscribe instantly from NXP Community, or adjust email frequency in your email preferences |
|