Content originally posted in LPCWare by MikeSimmonds on Fri Apr 20 09:45:45 MST 2012
[FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=2]
Quote:
If the IDE cannot handle a simple change like this, it is not much of an IDE to begin with.
[/SIZE][/FONT][FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=2]
[/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=2]I agree, I hate it when an IDE forces its methodology on you with no real way to customise things. Nanny does NOT always know best.
I don't like source and include in different dirs, (we [I]can[/I] prevent this in LPCXpresso), riduculously deep folder structures (LPCXp is not too bad here, but I'd still like [I]all[/I] files in the one dir -- yes objects, executables, temps, makefile, ld scripts, [I]everything[/I]!).
This what [I]I[/I] like; others [I]should[/I] be permitted to choose for themselves.
The worst thing I hate with IDE's is the disproportionate emphasis the place on their editor -- [I]and[/I] make you use it rather than the much better (IMHO of course) gVim. [Actually, what I do is to use gVim externally and let the IDE detect the external file changes.]
Of course, they put so much effort into stuff I do not want -- syntax colouring, intelisense (by another name Microsoft), unselected code by defines, and who knows what else, that you can sympathise with their evangelism.
My favourite IDE is a command window! ;)
Ok, Rant Mode Off. :D
[/SIZE][/FONT]