LPC LINK-2 error in connecting to LPC54606 using JTAG

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

LPC LINK-2 error in connecting to LPC54606 using JTAG

Jump to solution
2,067 Views
hemanthvasista
Contributor IV

Hello ,

I am using LPC54606 based custom board. I am unable to program using the LPC Link-2 using JTAG.

Attached is the error message in MCUexpresso and the log of the error in Redink server.

Error in MCUexpressoError in MCUexpressoSchematicSchematic

Also could you confirm the schematic attached?

 

LPC LOG:

 

[Started server]
[Connected on port 3025]
redlink> ProbeList
Index = 1
Manufacturer = NXP Semiconductors
Description = LPC-LINK2 CMSIS-DAP V5.361
Serial Number = KXBUAWIV
VID:PID = 1FC9:0090
Path = \\?\hid#vid_1fc9&pid_0090&mi_00#7&26531d9c&0&0000#{4d1e55b2-f16f-11cf-88cb-001111000030}
redlink> ProbeStatus
Index = 1
Manufacturer = NXP Semiconductors
Description = LPC-LINK2 CMSIS-DAP V5.361
Serial Number = KXBUAWIV
VID:PID = 1FC9:0090
Path = \\?\hid#vid_1fc9&pid_0090&mi_00#7&26531d9c&0&0000#{4d1e55b2-f16f-11cf-88cb-001111000030}
IsOpen = FALSE
WireInitialized = FALSE
WireProtocol = JTAG
CoresConfigured = FALSE
PacketSize = 1024
Reference Count = 0
HasSWV = FALSE
HasETM = FALSE
HasJTAG = TRUE
HasSWD = TRUE
Probe Type = CMSIS-DAP
Probe Reference Count = 0
redlink> ProbeIsOpen 1
FALSE
redlink> ProbeOpenByIndex 1
Probe Handle 1 Open
redlink> WireIsConnected 1
FALSE
redlink> WireSwdConnect 1
Error: Wire Ack Fault - target connected?
redlink> WireIspReset 1
redlink> ProbeStatus
Index = 1
Manufacturer = NXP Semiconductors
Description = LPC-LINK2 CMSIS-DAP V5.361
Serial Number = KXBUAWIV
VID:PID = 1FC9:0090
Path = \\?\hid#vid_1fc9&pid_0090&mi_00#7&26531d9c&0&0000#{4d1e55b2-f16f-11cf-88cb-001111000030}
IsOpen = TRUE
WireInitialized = FALSE
WireProtocol = SWD
CoresConfigured = FALSE
PacketSize = 1024
Reference Count = 0
HasSWV = FALSE
HasETM = FALSE
HasJTAG = TRUE
HasSWD = TRUE
Probe Type = CMSIS-DAP
Probe Reference Count = 0
redlink> quit
[Closed]

 

Executing flash operation 'Program' (Program file into flash: INTG_TIMER_DELAY_LED.axf) - Mon Dec 07 17:53:32 IST 2020
Checking MCU info...
Scanning for targets...
Executing flash action...
MCUXpresso IDE RedlinkMulti Driver v11.2 (Sep 22 2020 13:23:35 - crt_emu_cm_redlink.exe build 19)
( 0) Reading remote configuration
Wc(03). No cache support.
Found part description in XML file LPC54606_internal.xml
( 5) Remote configuration complete
Reconnected to existing LinkServer process.
Connecting to probe 1 core 0 (using server started externally) reports:
'Ee(42). Could not connect to core.'
Retrying...
Reconnected to existing LinkServer process.
Server OK but no connection to probe 1 core 0 (after 3 attempts) - Ee(42). Could not connect to core.
Failed on connect: Ee(42). Could not connect to core.
No connection to chip's debug port
(100) Target Connection Failed
Unable to perform operation!
Command failed with exit code 1

 

Thanks!!

Hemanth

0 Kudos
Reply
1 Solution
2,061 Views
converse
Senior Contributor V

As common with all ARM Cortex-M parts, JTAG is not used for debug - only boundary scan. Instead it uses SWD. See

https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE-FAQs/Design-Considerations-for-Debug/m-p/469565

 

 

View solution in original post

3 Replies
2,062 Views
converse
Senior Contributor V

As common with all ARM Cortex-M parts, JTAG is not used for debug - only boundary scan. Instead it uses SWD. See

https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE-FAQs/Design-Considerations-for-Debug/m-p/469565

 

 

2,057 Views
hemanthvasista
Contributor IV

 

Are there any way I can use JTAG in LPC54606? I remember to have used JTAG in LPC1768/88 controllers

 

In case of SWD,

I would need following pins:

1. SWCLK

2. SWDIO

3. SWO

Could you confirm? Also these pins are not overlapped with JTAG pin?

 

 

0 Kudos
Reply
2,048 Views
converse
Senior Contributor V

There is no way to use JTAG, for debug, in LPC54606.

The document I linked in my first reply, should give you all the information you require to create your debug circuit.

0 Kudos
Reply