Another question regarding PK and MK devices

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Another question regarding PK and MK devices

Jump to solution
1,372 Views
georgschmidt
Contributor III

Hi,

on my current PCB I am running a MK61FX512VMD12 controller with maskset 3N96B and date code 12/50.
Now I got offered a number of PK61FX512VMD12 controllers with the same maskset and date code 13/38. Please see the attached pictures.
Can I assume the code that runs on the MK devices will run also on the PK devices without any modification?

Regards,
Georg

MK61.jpg

PK61.jpg

  

0 Kudos
Reply
1 Solution
1,367 Views
jay_heng
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

PK part is factory sample, it is not trimmed (internal backdoor otp setting of analog module).

MK part is the final chip for customer.

From digital peripheral point of view, PK part is same as MK part.

View solution in original post

2 Replies
1,363 Views
georgschmidt
Contributor III

Thanks for your reply!

0 Kudos
Reply
1,368 Views
jay_heng
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

PK part is factory sample, it is not trimmed (internal backdoor otp setting of analog module).

MK part is the final chip for customer.

From digital peripheral point of view, PK part is same as MK part.

An error has occurred when reading existing sub-variable "Language_PG_Configuration"; see cause exception! The type of the containing value was: extended_hash+string (lithium.coreapi.webui.template.models.NamedValueByNameTemplateModel wrapped into f.e.b.StringModel) ---- FTL stack trace ("~" means nesting-related): - Failed at: #assign redirect_lingo_page_url = web... [in template "language_macro_header.ftl" at line 173, column 1] - Reached through: #include "language_macro_header.ftl" [in template "Language_translator_Dashboard" at line 3, column 1] ----