MC33901WEF instead of this part, can i use this part TJA1042T/3,118 ?.

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

MC33901WEF instead of this part, can i use this part TJA1042T/3,118 ?.

2,199 Views
tataraok6
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

MC33901WEF instead of this part, can i use this part TJA1042T/3,118 ?.

Is there any half duplex/full duplex difference there between these two parts?

0 Kudos
Reply
4 Replies

2,069 Views
xiangjun_rong
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

Hi, Tatarao,

The CAN transceiver MC33901WEF is obsolete, it is okay to use  TJA1042T/3 to replace the MC33901WEF .

Hope it can help you

BR

Xiangjun Rong

0 Kudos
Reply

2,069 Views
tataraok6
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Hi Xiangjun Rong,

Thanks.

TJA1042T/3 part description showing as Half duplex, but MC33901WEF part description not showing any thing like Half or full duplex. So any difference is there between these two parts about half or full duplex?

Regards,

Tatarao k

0 Kudos
Reply

2,069 Views
xiangjun_rong
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

Hi, Tatarao,

As you know that CAN BUS is a BUS architecture, so the CAN bus is HALF-DUPLEX, in other words, you can not transmit and receive simultaneously.

I think the TJA1042T/3 part can replace the MC33901WEF.

BR

XiangJun Rong

0 Kudos
Reply

2,069 Views
tataraok6
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Thanks

Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>

0 Kudos
Reply