<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic KW45 Change request for Datasheet about high RF input power during ISO testing in Wireless MCU</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Wireless-MCU/KW45-Change-request-for-Datasheet-about-high-RF-input-power/m-p/1714501#M15588</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;At KW45 datasheet, there is Max RF input power, Max +10dBm.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is Max operational condition.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, in case of ISO Testing, user need to apply&amp;nbsp;+27dBm max (0.5W Max) of interfering wave with 5cm radiated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It read about +14dBm&amp;nbsp;@ RF input pin. It exceed the +10dBm.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Customer doesn't expect to work propearly up to +14dBm.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But they expects not to get damaged on IC by ISO testing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, Customer requests NXP to add the statement in datasheet like below.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;“During ISO testing, by applying higher RF input power than +10dBm up to +20dBm, the device is still functional and not getting damaged”&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is just example of the wording, but could you discuss internally to add this kind of wording in datasheet at next document update?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2023 00:53:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>noriakimasuda</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-08-31T00:53:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>KW45 Change request for Datasheet about high RF input power during ISO testing</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Wireless-MCU/KW45-Change-request-for-Datasheet-about-high-RF-input-power/m-p/1714501#M15588</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;At KW45 datasheet, there is Max RF input power, Max +10dBm.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is Max operational condition.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, in case of ISO Testing, user need to apply&amp;nbsp;+27dBm max (0.5W Max) of interfering wave with 5cm radiated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It read about +14dBm&amp;nbsp;@ RF input pin. It exceed the +10dBm.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Customer doesn't expect to work propearly up to +14dBm.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But they expects not to get damaged on IC by ISO testing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, Customer requests NXP to add the statement in datasheet like below.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;“During ISO testing, by applying higher RF input power than +10dBm up to +20dBm, the device is still functional and not getting damaged”&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is just example of the wording, but could you discuss internally to add this kind of wording in datasheet at next document update?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2023 00:53:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Wireless-MCU/KW45-Change-request-for-Datasheet-about-high-RF-input-power/m-p/1714501#M15588</guid>
      <dc:creator>noriakimasuda</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-08-31T00:53:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: KW45 Change request for Datasheet about high RF input power during ISO testing</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Wireless-MCU/KW45-Change-request-for-Datasheet-about-high-RF-input-power/m-p/1721633#M15642</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Received feedback directly by e-mail&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2023 04:54:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Wireless-MCU/KW45-Change-request-for-Datasheet-about-high-RF-input-power/m-p/1721633#M15642</guid>
      <dc:creator>noriakimasuda</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-09-13T04:54:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

