<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Getting a better resolution with MPX2010DP in Sensors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Sensors/Getting-a-better-resolution-with-MPX2010DP/m-p/331022#M889</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, im using a MPX2010DP pressure sensor, Sourcing with 15v from 7815 regulator,&amp;nbsp; ADC 10bits built-in&amp;nbsp; pic18f4550, between sensor and pic there is a INA128 Instrumentation Amplifier, gain= 133,3, R= aprox 373 ohms, the resolution I've get now its about 100pascales, or in water column --&amp;gt; 1cm= 0.3937 in, I've got a 100mV of noisy signal, this resolution its after making an average by software of 64 samples from the adc, if i could get a better resolution it would be great, somebody worked with this sensor and got more resolution? i was trying to minimize de noise but i couldnt yet, maybe a should use another sensor.&amp;nbsp; Thanks!.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 23:47:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>GHernan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-02-03T23:47:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Getting a better resolution with MPX2010DP</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Sensors/Getting-a-better-resolution-with-MPX2010DP/m-p/331022#M889</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, im using a MPX2010DP pressure sensor, Sourcing with 15v from 7815 regulator,&amp;nbsp; ADC 10bits built-in&amp;nbsp; pic18f4550, between sensor and pic there is a INA128 Instrumentation Amplifier, gain= 133,3, R= aprox 373 ohms, the resolution I've get now its about 100pascales, or in water column --&amp;gt; 1cm= 0.3937 in, I've got a 100mV of noisy signal, this resolution its after making an average by software of 64 samples from the adc, if i could get a better resolution it would be great, somebody worked with this sensor and got more resolution? i was trying to minimize de noise but i couldnt yet, maybe a should use another sensor.&amp;nbsp; Thanks!.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 23:47:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Sensors/Getting-a-better-resolution-with-MPX2010DP/m-p/331022#M889</guid>
      <dc:creator>GHernan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-03T23:47:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Getting a better resolution with MPX2010DP</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Sensors/Getting-a-better-resolution-with-MPX2010DP/m-p/331023#M890</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Guillermo,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for using our community.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The resolution you already have is very good, I would recommend you to implement a low pass filter at the output of the sensor to reduce the noise.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please notice that the MPX2010 has a resolution of 2.5mV/kPa (page2, table1 of the datasheet). Which means that you're trying to measure 250uV ((2.5mV/kPa) * (1kPa/1000Pa)*(100Pa)). The sensor has a Vo full scale span of 25mV, hence the 250uV that you're measuring equals to 1%Vfss _AND_ the MPX2010 has a linearity of +-1%. Hence, the measurements you're reading could be inaccurate. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is the maximum pressure in your application? you could use the MPXx5004, which has a better resolution (1V/kPa) but has a lower pressure range (0-3.92kPa) and is an integrated pressure sensor, therefore you would not require the instrumental amplifier anymore: &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://cache.freescale.com/files/sensors/doc/data_sheet/MPXV5004G.pdf" style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 1.5em;" title="http://cache.freescale.com/files/sensors/doc/data_sheet/MPXV5004G.pdf"&gt;http://cache.freescale.com/files/sensors/doc/data_sheet/MPXV5004G.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;hope it helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Josh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 16:15:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Sensors/Getting-a-better-resolution-with-MPX2010DP/m-p/331023#M890</guid>
      <dc:creator>Joshevelle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-12T16:15:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

