https://community.nxp.com/t5/Sensors/FXLS8967AF-vs-FXLS8974CF/m-p/1812251#M7958 <P>Hello <SPAN>abialevich1</SPAN>,</P> <P>I hope all is great with you. Thank you for using the NXP communities.</P> <P>The FXLS8974CF&nbsp;targets industrial, medical and IoT market while the FXLS8967AF is recommended for general purpose automotive use cases.<BR /><BR /></P> <P>Therefore, the FXLS8967&nbsp;are specifically&nbsp;PPAPed for automotive application, while the FXLS8974 is not.<BR /><BR />For the FXLS8974, you&nbsp;may&nbsp;notice FXLS8974 spec typical values are all the same as FXLS8967, with differences that&nbsp;FXLS8967 spec puts a lot more restrictions with min/max limits for key specs like sensitivity and offset, power consumptions…&nbsp;over the&nbsp;operating&nbsp;temperature range of -40deg to 105deg&nbsp;for&nbsp;automotive&nbsp;environment, while FXLS8974 datasheet only specifies typical value at room temperature&nbsp;for industry use over range of&nbsp;-40deg to 105deg.&nbsp;Refer to screen shots below.&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;<BR /><BR />Refer to below picture for differences on software side, all 2 variants have the same register map expect the FXLS8974&nbsp;has a&nbsp;minor change on REF_UPDM bits in SDCD block which makes it better fit for slow motion detection in IoT.&nbsp;</P> <P><span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="diazmarin09_0-1708471645227.png" style="width: 400px;"><img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/264122iC8C1F181B5029567/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;px=400" role="button" title="diazmarin09_0-1708471645227.png" alt="diazmarin09_0-1708471645227.png" /></span></P> <P>I hope this information helps.</P> <P>Regards,</P> <P>David</P> Tue, 20 Feb 2024 23:27:48 GMT diazmarin09 2024-02-20T23:27:48Z https://community.nxp.com/t5/Sensors/FXLS8967AF-vs-FXLS8974CF/m-p/1812224#M7957 <P>Are there any differences between these two components,&nbsp;FXLS8967AF vs FXLS8974CF?</P> Tue, 03 Feb 2026 21:32:43 GMT https://community.nxp.com/t5/Sensors/FXLS8967AF-vs-FXLS8974CF/m-p/1812224#M7957 abialevich1 2026-02-03T21:32:43Z https://community.nxp.com/t5/Sensors/FXLS8967AF-vs-FXLS8974CF/m-p/1812251#M7958 <P>Hello <SPAN>abialevich1</SPAN>,</P> <P>I hope all is great with you. Thank you for using the NXP communities.</P> <P>The FXLS8974CF&nbsp;targets industrial, medical and IoT market while the FXLS8967AF is recommended for general purpose automotive use cases.<BR /><BR /></P> <P>Therefore, the FXLS8967&nbsp;are specifically&nbsp;PPAPed for automotive application, while the FXLS8974 is not.<BR /><BR />For the FXLS8974, you&nbsp;may&nbsp;notice FXLS8974 spec typical values are all the same as FXLS8967, with differences that&nbsp;FXLS8967 spec puts a lot more restrictions with min/max limits for key specs like sensitivity and offset, power consumptions…&nbsp;over the&nbsp;operating&nbsp;temperature range of -40deg to 105deg&nbsp;for&nbsp;automotive&nbsp;environment, while FXLS8974 datasheet only specifies typical value at room temperature&nbsp;for industry use over range of&nbsp;-40deg to 105deg.&nbsp;Refer to screen shots below.&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;<BR /><BR />Refer to below picture for differences on software side, all 2 variants have the same register map expect the FXLS8974&nbsp;has a&nbsp;minor change on REF_UPDM bits in SDCD block which makes it better fit for slow motion detection in IoT.&nbsp;</P> <P><span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="diazmarin09_0-1708471645227.png" style="width: 400px;"><img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/264122iC8C1F181B5029567/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;px=400" role="button" title="diazmarin09_0-1708471645227.png" alt="diazmarin09_0-1708471645227.png" /></span></P> <P>I hope this information helps.</P> <P>Regards,</P> <P>David</P> Tue, 20 Feb 2024 23:27:48 GMT https://community.nxp.com/t5/Sensors/FXLS8967AF-vs-FXLS8974CF/m-p/1812251#M7958 diazmarin09 2024-02-20T23:27:48Z