<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Sensors中的主题 Re: MMA8652 vs MMA8451</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Sensors/MMA8652-vs-MMA8451/m-p/511148#M3213</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi David,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just to double confirm, the datasheet shows all 4 capacitors as polarized, which I think is a typo.&amp;nbsp; Is it OK to use 4 none polarized capacitors?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2016 19:13:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>tuurbo46</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-01-25T19:13:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MMA8652 vs MMA8451</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Sensors/MMA8652-vs-MMA8451/m-p/511146#M3211</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am just in the process of selecting a new Accelerator.&amp;nbsp; I have rounded my selection down to two chips, the MMA8652 and the MMA8451.&amp;nbsp; Am I correct in thinking other than one is 12bit and the other 14bit, and they have different packages, they are both similar in complexity?&amp;nbsp; My meaning is, one is not easier to program and configure over the other chip.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also from a design point of view on low power battery powered products, is it better to have the INT pins pull-up or pull-down?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lastly looking at the datasheet on the MMA8652, the circuit diagram shows polarized capacitors around the chip, I think these should be none polarized.&amp;nbsp; Am I correct?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 22:27:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Sensors/MMA8652-vs-MMA8451/m-p/511146#M3211</guid>
      <dc:creator>tuurbo46</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-03T22:27:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MMA8652 vs MMA8451</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Sensors/MMA8652-vs-MMA8451/m-p/511147#M3212</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Basically, the main differences between the devices mentioned are the &lt;STRONG&gt;resolution&lt;/STRONG&gt; and the &lt;STRONG&gt;package options&lt;/STRONG&gt;. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="mma8451 vs 8652.jpg"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/56287i249C8DAFDEEE121A/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="mma8451 vs 8652.jpg" alt="mma8451 vs 8652.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. In regard with the complexity you mentioned, both of the devices use the I2C interface. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can find software examples &lt;A href="https://community.nxp.com/docs/DOC-329568"&gt;here &lt;/A&gt;in order to program and configure the device you need. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. It depends of your application if you place a pull-up or pull-down on the INT pins.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="text-align: justify;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="text-align: justify;"&gt;The interrupt pins can be configured to be push-pull or open drain and can be either Active High or Active Low. If a pull-up resistor is used on the interrupt pins with the open drain setting, then the accelerometer should be configured to Active Low. If a pull-down resistor is used, then the interrupt pin should be configured to be Active High. This is done in Register 0x2C (MMA8451, 2, 3Q).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For more details please review the Application note AN4077:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.nxp.com/files/sensors/doc/app_note/AN4077.pdf"&gt;AN4077 - MMA845xQ Design Checklist and Board Mounting Guidelines&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4. Finally, the capacitor at the BYP pin should be place there in order to &lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;guarantee the stability&lt;/SPAN&gt; of the internal regulator while the rest of them are decoupling capacitors.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope this information will be useful for you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I misunderstood your question, feel free to let me know.&amp;nbsp; I will be glad to help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have a great day.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;David Diaz.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2016 16:54:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Sensors/MMA8652-vs-MMA8451/m-p/511147#M3212</guid>
      <dc:creator>david_diaz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-25T16:54:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MMA8652 vs MMA8451</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Sensors/MMA8652-vs-MMA8451/m-p/511148#M3213</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi David,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just to double confirm, the datasheet shows all 4 capacitors as polarized, which I think is a typo.&amp;nbsp; Is it OK to use 4 none polarized capacitors?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2016 19:13:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Sensors/MMA8652-vs-MMA8451/m-p/511148#M3213</guid>
      <dc:creator>tuurbo46</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-25T19:13:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

