<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Sensor Fusion Library on the FRDM-KW40Z in Sensors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Sensors/Sensor-Fusion-Library-on-the-FRDM-KW40Z/m-p/442571#M2269</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Matthew,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are no plans in place at this time.&amp;nbsp; Our general strategy is to not even attempt to provide canned solutions for &lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;all&lt;/SPAN&gt; Freedom boards.&amp;nbsp; Instead, our focus is on providing representative projects for each class of MCU as well as very detailed documentation to provide customers enough information to easily port to ANY MCU of their choice.&amp;nbsp; We may revisit the KW40Z in the future because of its integrated BLE, but it won't be this year.&amp;nbsp; The biggest issue I see there is not porting the sensor fusion, but retrofitting our toolkits for BLE.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will mention that we ARE about to post to this community a pre-release of Version 5.00 of the library.&amp;nbsp; So keep your eyes glued to this channel :smileywink:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mike&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:15:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>michaelestanley</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-09-11T15:15:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Sensor Fusion Library on the FRDM-KW40Z</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Sensors/Sensor-Fusion-Library-on-the-FRDM-KW40Z/m-p/442570#M2268</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are there plans to support the Sensor Fusion Library on the FRDM-KW40Z?&amp;nbsp; If so, what is the timeframe?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 23:01:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Sensors/Sensor-Fusion-Library-on-the-FRDM-KW40Z/m-p/442570#M2268</guid>
      <dc:creator>matthewforce</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-03T23:01:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sensor Fusion Library on the FRDM-KW40Z</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Sensors/Sensor-Fusion-Library-on-the-FRDM-KW40Z/m-p/442571#M2269</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Matthew,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are no plans in place at this time.&amp;nbsp; Our general strategy is to not even attempt to provide canned solutions for &lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;all&lt;/SPAN&gt; Freedom boards.&amp;nbsp; Instead, our focus is on providing representative projects for each class of MCU as well as very detailed documentation to provide customers enough information to easily port to ANY MCU of their choice.&amp;nbsp; We may revisit the KW40Z in the future because of its integrated BLE, but it won't be this year.&amp;nbsp; The biggest issue I see there is not porting the sensor fusion, but retrofitting our toolkits for BLE.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will mention that we ARE about to post to this community a pre-release of Version 5.00 of the library.&amp;nbsp; So keep your eyes glued to this channel :smileywink:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mike&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:15:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Sensors/Sensor-Fusion-Library-on-the-FRDM-KW40Z/m-p/442571#M2269</guid>
      <dc:creator>michaelestanley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-11T15:15:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

