<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Secure AuthenticationのトピックIs it true that no need se50 if CAAM exists</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Secure-Authentication/Is-it-true-that-no-need-se50-if-CAAM-exists/m-p/1083386#M313</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;IMX serial has SNVS and CAAM to encrypt user data, such as IoT credentials. I have two questions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. So I do not need an extra encryption chip such as se50, is it right?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. SNVS will detect RTC,if a tamper event happend, SNVS will remove the key. So if I want to replate the cell battery of RTC, will SNVS remove the key? How SNVS knows it is under attack or in maintain mode?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2020 11:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>brucezhao</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-06-23T11:30:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is it true that no need se50 if CAAM exists</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Secure-Authentication/Is-it-true-that-no-need-se50-if-CAAM-exists/m-p/1083386#M313</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;IMX serial has SNVS and CAAM to encrypt user data, such as IoT credentials. I have two questions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. So I do not need an extra encryption chip such as se50, is it right?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. SNVS will detect RTC,if a tamper event happend, SNVS will remove the key. So if I want to replate the cell battery of RTC, will SNVS remove the key? How SNVS knows it is under attack or in maintain mode?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2020 11:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Secure-Authentication/Is-it-true-that-no-need-se50-if-CAAM-exists/m-p/1083386#M313</guid>
      <dc:creator>brucezhao</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-23T11:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

